AMD Phenom X4 9350e - 65W quad-core

July 24, 2008 | 09:06

Tags: #overclocking

Companies: #amd

Power Consumption

For our power consumption testing, we used the same Corsair XMS2 8500C5 Dominator memory and Nvidia GeForce 8800 Ultra in both AMD and Intel systems to maintain consistency.

This also helped to eliminate any chance of differences in power consumption between components - something that we've certainly experienced in the past.

We removed all additional cooling fans with only the CPU cooler left plugged in, while we also reset the BIOS and enabled fail safe defaults.

Finally, we made sure that both AMD Cool'n'Quiet and Intel EIST/C1E power saving technologies were tested enabled and disabled.





Power Consumption

Power at wall socket. All onboard hardware enabled, BIOS Defaults. Prime95 Load.

  • Core 2 Duo E4500 (G0, 65nm)
  • Core 2 Duo E8200 (C0, 45nm)
  • Core 2 Duo E8400 (C0, 45nm)
  • Core 2 Duo E8500 (C0, 45nm)
  • Core 2 Duo E6550 (G0, 65nm)
  • Core 2 Duo E6750 (G0, 65nm)
  • Core 2 Duo E6850 (G0, 65nm)
  • Phenom X4 9350e (DR-B3, 65nm) (Cool'n'Quiet Enabled)
  • Phenom X4 9350e (DR-B3, 65nm) (Cool'n'Quiet Disabled)
  • Phenom X3 8750 (B3, 65nm) (Cool'n'Quiet Enabled)
  • Phenom X3 8750 (B3, 65nm) (Cool'n'Quiet Disabled)
  • Phenom X4 9500 (DR-B2, 65nm)
  • Phenom X4 9600 (DR-B2, 65nm)
  • Athlon X2 6000+ (JH-F3, 90nm)
  • Athlon X2 6400+ (JH-F3, 90nm)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6600 (G0, 65nm)
  • Phenom X4 9550 (DR-B3, 65nm) (Cool'n'Quiet Enabled)
  • Phenom X4 9550 (DR-B3, 65nm) (Cool'n'Quiet Disabled)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6700 (G0, 65nm)
  • Phenom X4 9750 (DR-B3, 65nm) (Cool'n'Quiet Enabled)
  • Phenom X4 9750 (DR-B3, 65nm) (Cool'n'Quiet Disabled)
  • Phenom 9850 X4 (DR-B3, B3) (Cool'n'Quiet Enabled)
  • Phenom X4 9850 (DR-B3, 65nm) (Cool'n'Quiet Disabled)
    • 185.0
    • 149.0
    • 189.0
    • 150.0
    • 191.0
    • 151.0
    • 196.0
    • 150.0
    • 203.0
    • 153.0
    • 207.0
    • 153.0
    • 211.0
    • 154.0
    • 224.0
    • 175.0
    • 224.0
    • 189.0
    • 244.0
    • 180.0
    • 245.0
    • 207.0
    • 253.0
    • 207.0
    • 254.0
    • 213.0
    • 273.0
    • 191.0
    • 274.0
    • 193.0
    • 285.0
    • 179.0
    • 289.0
    • 200.0
    • 293.0
    • 228.0
    • 293.0
    • 182.0
    • 299.0
    • 198.0
    • 299.0
    • 234.0
    • 306.0
    • 202.0
    • 307.0
    • 237.0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Watts (lower is better)
  • Load
  • Idle

As expected, the Phenom X4 9350e uses less power better than every other quad-core we've seen, although the X3 8750 isn't hugely far off - with CnQ enabled it's just 5W more at idle and 20W more at load while also having several hundred more MHz core clock and a fantastic overhead for overclocking. With Cool'n'Quiet disabled, the power consumption again goes up but to a greater degree on the X3 8750. Overall though, there's a significant power saving by 50, 60, and even 70W compared to the other Phenoms. It's not that much more than some of the dual-core chips - both the E8400/8500 (for example) are rated at a 65W TDP - but the whole system is respectively lower power.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04

TOP STORIES

SUGGESTED FOR YOU