Radeon HD 2600 XT vs. GeForce 8600 GT

Written by Tim Smalley

August 14, 2007 | 12:01

Tags: #256mb #2600 #8600 #g84 #gddr3 #gddr4 #geforce #gt #hd #radeon #rv630 #xt

Companies: #amd #asus #ati #nvidia #sapphire

Call of Duty 2

Publisher: Activision

We used the full version of Call of Duty 2, patched to version 1.2. The game makes use of some awesome effects and is generally very graphically intense and immersive. That's helped by the tremendous smoke effect that Infinity Ward has created -- it's better than anything we've ever seen before. There are also real time shadows and subtle HDR lighting effects too.

The gameplay is not as linear as the first version of Call of Duty, and Infinity Ward has ditched the rather old Quake 3 engine in favour of creating its own proprietary graphics engine to render the effects. There is something about the game that makes it very intense and you often find yourself having to take a break from the action because you're too overwhelmed by its immersiveness and intensity.

We used a custom timedemo that covers both indoor and outdoor performance in the title across one of the most intensive portions of the game. The Optimise for SLI option was disabled for single GPU configurations as it causes some texture corruption if there is only one GPU present. It was enabled for dual-GPU configurations and all other options were set to medium-high settings - we've included screenshots below.

Radeon HD 2600 XT vs. GeForce 8600 GT Call Of Duty 2 Radeon HD 2600 XT vs. GeForce 8600 GT Call Of Duty 2

Call Of Duty 2

1024x768, 2xAA 8xAF, Medium-High Quality

  • ATI Radeon X1950 XT 256MB
  • ATI Radeon X1950 Pro 256MB
  • Nvidia GeForce 8600 GTS 256MB
  • Nvidia GeForce 7900 GS 256MB
  • ATI Radeon X1650 XT 256MB
  • Asus EN8600GT 256MB
  • Nvidia GeForce 7600 GT 256MB
  • Sapphire Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB GDDR4
    • 76.4
    • 71.4
    • 59.0
    • 54.0
    • 47.9
    • 43.8
    • 41.9
    • 37.9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Frames Per Second
  • Average

Call Of Duty 2

1024x768, 4xAA 8xAF, Medium-High Quality

  • ATI Radeon X1950 XT 256MB
  • ATI Radeon X1950 Pro 256MB
  • Nvidia GeForce 8600 GTS 256MB
  • Nvidia GeForce 7900 GS 256MB
  • ATI Radeon X1650 XT 256MB
  • Asus EN8600GT 256MB
  • Nvidia GeForce 7600 GT 256MB
  • Sapphire Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB GDDR4
    • 72.1
    • 66.5
    • 56.5
    • 51.6
    • 44.7
    • 41.7
    • 39.4
    • 35.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Frames Per Second
  • Average

Call Of Duty 2

1280x1024, 0xAA 8xAF, Medium-High Quality

  • ATI Radeon X1950 XT 256MB
  • ATI Radeon X1950 Pro 256MB
  • Nvidia GeForce 8600 GTS 256MB
  • Nvidia GeForce 7900 GS 256MB
  • ATI Radeon X1650 XT 256MB
  • Sapphire Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB GDDR4
  • Asus EN8600GT 256MB
  • Nvidia GeForce 7600 GT 256MB
    • 61.6
    • 59.1
    • 46.3
    • 43.2
    • 39.1
    • 35.9
    • 33.8
    • 33.6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Frames Per Second
  • Average

Call Of Duty 2

1280x1024, 2xAA 8xAF, Medium-High Quality

  • ATI Radeon X1950 XT 256MB
  • ATI Radeon X1950 Pro 256MB
  • Nvidia GeForce 8600 GTS 256MB
  • Nvidia GeForce 7900 GS 256MB
  • ATI Radeon X1650 XT 256MB
  • Asus EN8600GT 256MB
  • Nvidia GeForce 7600 GT 256MB
  • Sapphire Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB GDDR4
    • 56.3
    • 50.6
    • 41.5
    • 38.9
    • 32.7
    • 29.6
    • 29.1
    • 26.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Frames Per Second
  • Average

Call Of Duty 2

1680x1050, 0xAA 8xAF, Medium-High Quality

  • ATI Radeon X1950 XT 256MB
  • ATI Radeon X1950 Pro 256MB
  • Nvidia GeForce 7900 GS 256MB
  • Nvidia GeForce 8600 GTS 256MB
  • ATI Radeon X1650 XT 256MB
  • Sapphire Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB GDDR4
  • Asus EN8600GT 256MB
  • Nvidia GeForce 7600 GT 256MB
    • 48.5
    • 46.6
    • 36.2
    • 34.2
    • 31.5
    • 28.8
    • 28.4
    • 27.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
Frames Per Second
  • Average

Here's another scenario where the Radeon HD 2600 XT GDDR4 suffers from below-par performance with anti-aliasing enabled. What's worse though is the fact that it's slower than a Radeon X1650 XT right across the board. Based on the games we've looked at so far, it looks as if the Radeon HD 2600 XT GDDR4 suffers from the same poor anti-aliasing performance as the Radeon HD 2900 XT, but because of the limiting 128-bit bus it makes "poor" sound generous.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04

TOP STORIES

SUGGESTED FOR YOU