Gigabyte GA-GC230D Atom Mini-ITX

September 10, 2008 | 08:14

Tags: #16ghz #945g #atom #benchmark #diamondville #efficient #hd #high #itx #mini #motherboard #playback #power #result #review #silverthorne

Companies: #gigabyte #intel

Adobe Photoshop Elements 4.0

For our Photoshop Elements test, we used a selection of 400 three megapixel photographs taken in a variety of surroundings using the batch file processing function in the Elements Editor. We performed all of the auto fixes, including Auto Levels, Auto Contrast, Auto Colour and Sharpen before resizing the image to 640x480 and saving as a high quality JPEG.

Adobe Photoshop Elements

Quick Fix, 400 Photos, 2048x1536 to 640x480 HQ .jpg

  • Gigabyte GA-GC230D (Intel Atom 230 1.6GHz)
  • EPIA EX 15000G (VIA C7 1.5GHz)
  • 1574
  • 1983
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Time in Seconds (lower is better)

The Gigabyte Atom board is about 20 percent faster than the VIA EPIA, at only 100MHz increment in CPU speed that's a significant difference in favour of the Atom. However, compared to a more common dual-core CPU that takes typically between 300-500 seconds, over 1,500 is considerably slower.

File Compression & Encryption:

Our file compression and decompression tests were split into two halves to cover a broad spectrum of performance. The first test we ran was to compress and encrypt the MPEG-2 source file from our video encoding test with the highest quality compression ratio. Secondly, we compressed and encrypted the folder of 400 photographs used in our Photoshop Elements test with the same compression settings.

Large File Compression & Encryption

WinRAR 3.60, Multithreaded, 276MB source file

  • Gigabyte GA-GC230D (Intel Atom 230 1.6GHz)
  • EPIA EX 15000G (VIA C7 1.5GHz)
  • 439
  • 1063
0
250
500
750
1000
Time in Seconds (lower is better)

Small File Compression & Encryption

WinRAR 3.60, Multithreaded, 400 2048x1536 Photos

  • Gigabyte GA-GC230D (Intel Atom 230 1.6GHz)
  • EPIA EX 15000G (VIA C7 1.5GHz)
  • 402
  • 895
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Time in Seconds (lower is better)

The file and small file compression on the Gigabyte Atom motherboard takes less than half the time compared to the VIA EPIA with C7 CPU - a significant increase in performance.

File Decompression & Decryption:

The two RAR archives created during the compression and encryption tests were then decompressed and decrypted.

Large File Decompression & Decryption

WinRAR 3.60, Multithreaded, 276MB source file

  • Gigabyte GA-GC230D (Intel Atom 230 1.6GHz)
  • EPIA EX 15000G (VIA C7 1.5GHz)
  • 38
  • 61
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Time in Seconds (lower is better)

Small File Decompression & Decryption

WinRAR 3.60, Multithreaded, 400 2048x1536 Photos

  • Gigabyte GA-GC230D (Intel Atom 230 1.6GHz)
  • EPIA EX 15000G (VIA C7 1.5GHz)
  • 65
  • 99
0
25
50
75
100
Time in Seconds (lower is better)

Again in decompression testing the Gigabyte Atom board is significantly faster in decompression tests too.

Xvid Encoding:

We tested video encoding performance using VirtualDub-MPEG version 1.6.15 and a multithreaded version of the Xvid codec, along with the LAME MT MP3 encoder for encoding audio. We did a two-pass encode of a 15-minute 276MB digital TV recording with a target file size of 100MB.

Xvid Encoding

VirtualDub MPEG-2 1.6.15, Xvid 1.2 beta, 276MB .mpg to 100MB .avi

  • Gigabyte GA-GC230D (Intel Atom 230 1.6GHz)
  • EPIA EX 15000G (VIA C7 1.5GHz)
  • 2831
  • 5521
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Time in Seconds (lower is better)

2,800 seconds is still 47 minutes to encode just 15 minutes of video. The Intel Atom (or VIA C7 for that matter) is simply not designed for video encoding so if you do want to use this for a HTPC with video recording, bear in mind that you'll need a separate compression processor or a full fat CPU to do the job because neither of these ultra low power "nettop" processors will cut it.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04

TOP STORIES

SUGGESTED FOR YOU