Get your Dell sans Windows if you like.
A Linux enthusiast has managed to get Dell to honour the refund clause in the Microsoft Windows EULA.
It's pretty difficult to buy a laptop without Windows these days. But what if you have no intention of using it? The EULA for Windows XP has this clause:
"You agree to be bound by the terms of this EULA by installing, copying, or otherwise using the software. If you do not agree, do not install, copy, or use the software; you may return it to your place of purchase for a full refund, if applicable."
Technically, then, you should be allowed to send it back to your place of purchase and get a refund. This is exactly what Dave Mitchell, a systems admin, did.
Dell agreed to refund the cost of Windows, to the sum of just over 55 quid.
Full details of Dave's escapades are over at
LinuxWorld, where the open source advocates are cooing over his achievement.
Let us know your thoughts on the so-called 'Windows Tax'
over in the forums.
you know, this sort of thing just might be the imputes it takes to get system builders like Dell to offer bare (OS free) laptops. I would say that this is another small step towards real choice in OSes for the mainsteam market.
My school bought some dell desktops and had the choice to buy it without Windows so the got a copy of FreeDos. We didnt use it as we installed Linux on them for tests.
I'm curious about that. Do you get them in a box and sell them or do you do anything to them? If you get them in a box, do you think you could go back to your supplier and get them to eat the cost? Ultimatly that's where the pressure needs to be applied andwhile this is a win for individals, the real pressure will come when stores choose to carry Brand X over brand Y because X offers bare lappys.
This would not be an issue if you could buy a bare laptop.
But there should be the option to buy a laptop or desktop without windows already installed. This is why Microsoft has the monopoly. It would also mean cheaper laptops without MS thrown in there.
But they wont do that because piracy would increase because the cosumers would buy the laptop without MS XP and get a pirate copy of XP which will save them cash as its so much more benificial. As if they buy the laptop with MS XP then why wont get a pirate copy as there is no point.
We get them in boxed and ready to roll. I suppose I could go back to the supplier, but Im not sure how successful that would be, as I'm only a very small reseller, and they'd probably just say get lost as I'd be no loss to the company!
I do agree that 'no os' should be an option on all computers and laptops, though.
Now if only you could get them to stop putting the Intel one on.... ;)
When I got my 2 sony laptops, the first thing i did before powering them up was spend 10 mins peeling all the stupid stickers off and cleaning up with a can of WD40. :)
In which case, since Microsoft can only sell their product by forcing it on people, isn't it on them to make a product that people actually want to pay for.
I agree with you to some extent, mainly due to the inevitable increase in WGA "protection" if computers were sold sans Windows.
The whole issue has something wrong with it though. Computer manufacturers SHOULD be required to offer no OS on new hardware. But I can also see massive problems with this where a normal users see no differentiation between "Windows" and a "Computer".
Maybe the industry should force ALL programs and games to be able to be run on any OS. That would sort things out...... probably.