Published on 21st March 2012 by
Originally Posted by Page 1, Paragraph 7The quoted figures of 5Gbps (625MB/sec) aren’t quite what you can expect, especially if you're not using an SSD, but as our testing shows, you can easily see upwards of 80MB/sec using USB 3 storage devices – a huge boost over their USB 3 counterparts, which can barely manage 20MB/sec - and this means you’ll lose little in the way of speed if you decide to use a USB hard disk instead of one connected to a SATA port.
Originally Posted by Page 2, Last ParagraphYou’re next PC or motherboard or case for that matter certainly will, so investing in a USB 2 external hard disk is a very short-sighted thing to do, especially given how expensive they are.
Originally Posted by CombatusThanks, sorted!
Originally Posted by CombatusThat is another option, if your external caddy supports it (a vast majority of 2.5in external drives are USB 2 or USB 3 though) however I've lost count of the number of people that have told me they hate it because of the connector - I too have found it a little too easy to pull out. Just moving my PC once saw it ping out of the socket on my motherboard!
Originally Posted by ZeDestructorHow about eSATA? I for one have an eSATA dock (has usb2 as well) and the necessary port is found on most machines. Since the disk is attached directly to the chipset, its basically running as fast as it will ever run.
Originally Posted by MjFrostyUSB 3.0 is faster than eSATA in every test you care to mention.
Originally Posted by MjFrostyQuote:Originally Posted by ZeDestructorHow about eSATA? I for one have an eSATA dock (has usb2 as well) and the necessary port is found on most machines. Since the disk is attached directly to the chipset, its basically running as fast as it will ever run.
USB 3.0 is faster than eSATA in every test you care to mention. That said, people just don't CARE about the increase as it is to the consumer every bit as the same as USB 2.0. The jump from USB 1.0 was much more significant. Much like every thing in the industry right now, it's just a stepping stone.
Originally Posted by MjFrostyOh don't get me wrong, I have an E-SATA dock and E-SATA hdd. No USB 3.0 devices at all currently. :)
Originally Posted by Gareth HalfacreeThe trouble with USB (of any flavour) is the massive CPU overhead. It's far greater than that of FireWire or eSATA. Not sure how it compares to Thunderbolt, though - I'll have to look in to that.
Originally Posted by BLCExactly. It may not be as noticeable these days, but it's still there. I know that FireWire uses hardware controllers in each device as opposed to relying on the CPU, but I don't know if this is also the case with Thunderbolt.
You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.
11th February 2016
10th February 2016
9th February 2016
© Copyright bit-tech