Published on 15th May 2009 by
Originally Posted by CupboardCan you actually use these 2.5" desktop SSDs in laptops, or are they slightly too big or power hungry?
Originally Posted by leexgxno point in RAID with the vertex as its so fast it be better it just buy 1 (120gb for £330 or 240gb for an nice price of £630) use them as independant drive you get no perfomance useing 2 of them as on board RAID is limited to around 300MB/s any way and 1TB disk for cloneing SSD and big files
Originally Posted by naokajiQuote:Originally Posted by CupboardCan you actually use these 2.5" desktop SSDs in laptops, or are they slightly too big or power hungry?
Yep, you can use them in notebooks just fine, the performance boost is even more amazing there obviously as you won't be comparing them to a velociraptor or two but rather one of those horribly slow notebook harddisks.
Power consumption is not a issue, they don't even use 5W.
There is a theory out in the wild though that it will increase power consumption of the cpu (since the rest of the computer will spend less time idle waiting for the hdd), but I don't really think it would matter enough to negate the lower power consumption of the ssd vs hdd since if you get a decent mobile cpu you are looking at below 20W anyway.
Originally Posted by BazOnce you've used a decent SSD like the Vertex for an extended period of time, going back to a sluggish HDD seems like the difference between running and walking. Everything seems more response, especially in the legendarily slugish Vista, applications and programs open noticeably faster, browsing files and folders is quicker, the whole operating system experience is improved.
While it's not really possible to test this increased responsiveness, booting off of the SSD just made the whole system feel faster and more responsive. Is £300 a lot to pay for 120GB? Certainly, but you get a lot more than faster boot and game loads for your money.
Originally Posted by droitwichdosserQuote:Originally Posted by leexgxno point in RAID with the vertex as its so fast it be better it just buy 1 (120gb for £330 or 240gb for an nice price of £630) use them as independant drive you get no perfomance useing 2 of them as on board RAID is limited to around 300MB/s any way and 1TB disk for cloneing SSD and big files
Dont think the onboard RAID is limited to 300MB/s, each disk is effectively limited to that but not the RAID controller...
In this youtube vid (2*60GB RAIDed) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=go8vnZj2vb4&feature=related the guy/gal is using an ASUS P6T WS Revolution onboard raid with to get an average read speed of 417.0MB/s
to sequential read speed across the drive
Originally Posted by azrael-I can't really see how they're (and by they I mean all SSD manufacturers) going to fix the performance degradation issue. It's a problem that is inherent to the flash technology.
The problem is that of data pages. Every time you want to change even 1 bit you have to read the page that bit is stored in, erase that page and then write it back. At first, when the disk is fresh and unused data can simply be written to the disk. However, as more and more of the disk's space gets filled you'll have to perform the routine mentioned above. A way to alleviate the problem a bit is to have a huge DRAM cache on the disk. Intel's X25 series has 16MB on-board and I believe the Vertex has 64MB, which is the main, if not the only, reason it's faster than the X25 at writing.
Oh, and by the way, any SSD using the JMicron JMF602 controller is a pure hands-off product. Avoid at all cost! They'll never run fast, even if a "new" design is advertised. They also consume way too much power.
Originally Posted by HourBeforeDawnIBM... Im pretty sure its IBM, I read the info A LONG time ago is developing what they call nano wire race tracks, which should eliminate ALL the known issues with current SSD and take that technology to the next level but who knows how long that could take.
Originally Posted by leexgxwindows 7 supports an SSD command called TRIM (the SSD it self needs to support this command)
http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=3531&p=10 (i recommend reading all pages press the print button, but do not go full screen keep it about 6in wide so its more readable) page 10 explanes then TRIM command it alows it to wipe an block so its ready to receve data and for the most part all SSD companys need to do is bring an update out for the SSD
Originally Posted by leexgxJMicron is slow any way be it fresh format or not (small writes)
Originally Posted by outlawaolA 7/10 on value? Haha! A 128gb SSD for $380 is not a good value. Access speeds, read/write speeds aside cost per GB is insane. Sitting at over $2.96 a GB, that is insanity. Considering I just bought a 1TB mech drive for $.08 per GB.
I honestly dont see the attraction to these drives (other then no moving parts). Being a solid memory architecture, does not the memory integrity start to get compromised over use? (something like 250k read/writes starts to get corrupt?)
I would throw the rating down to a 2/10 for value, as nearly $3 a GB is simply to much, no matter how they try to "spin it".
Originally Posted by leexgx
i guess to get an higher score then 6.0 on video needs an DX11 card,
You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.
10th February 2016
9th February 2016
8th February 2016
© Copyright bit-tech