Published on 29th November 2010 by
Originally Posted by srmansAgreed, they could be cheaper but then don't forget they offer other advantages some of us need i.e. easy of setup and low power consumption.
Bit-tech, any chance you could update your performance charts in this review or future storage reviews to show baselines Win7PC-2-Win7PC transfers, or Linux for that matter on similar storage (green drives) and network (1GbE) hardware? This would allow us to view NAS storage performance in the context that most of us are familiar with i.e. peer to peer Windows shares. The added context would be very helpful, you could use two "Affordable" build machines perhaps....
Originally Posted by FractalYawn... Wake me up when off-the shelf NAS boxes either maximise Gigabit bandwidth or are cheap enough to justify the slow speed.
You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.
29th April 2016
27th April 2016
26th April 2016
© Copyright bit-tech