Great mobo review Richard. Just ordered one of these boards up after reading this review by yourself. This is my first AMD board ever so I am looking forward to the new architecture over Intels old FSB! Will miss SLI but am happy to run my Nvidia cards through this board.
Well done on working on a Bank Holiday too. I am as well so I know how you feel/ felt!
Originally Posted by tejas Great mobo review Richard. Just ordered one of these boards up after reading this review by yourself. This is my first AMD board ever so I am looking forward to the new architecture over Intels old FSB! Will miss SLI but am happy to run my Nvidia cards through this board.
Well done on working on a Bank Holiday too. I am as well so I know how you feel/ felt!
:) I still prefer Intel's tbh - feels more natural to me, but it takes time to learn the ropes of feeling of a new architecture so I encourage patience ;)
No holiday for me right now - spent the last 2 hours doing PRs and helping organise an upcoming competition :( (Also, Tim probably spent about 3hrs reading it this morning too :P poor sod haha)
this or the older one be very good for folding (4x video cards 9600GSO, GTX295 9800GX2), this one at last thay put the SATA ports on the side as on the older board thay the video cards whould block the SATA ports
Looks very good, its taken a while for the Am3 board reviews to surface. I bought the GA-MA790FXT-UD5P basically 3 months ago now, and I have still barely seen a review of it.
The board layout for this board is one of the best ive ever seen. Despite the mention of the northbridge/drmos heatsink getting a bit warm, its in an ideal position, and the combo heatsink frees up more room for the expansion slot (something that seems to be an issue on the x58 boards).
other thing was the SB750 sata ports were tested, as was the JMB362 esata port.... but not the JMB322. You seemed to suggest that the two jmicron chips are the same, or at least give the same performance. Any clarification on that?
Originally Posted by Ross1 other thing was the SB750 sata ports were tested, as was the JMB362 esata port.... but not the JMB322. You seemed to suggest that the two jmicron chips are the same, or at least give the same performance. Any clarification on that?
I'll fish out the numbers, but I didn't put them in.
Null - two x16 or four x8. Normal for the 790FX. The Skulltrail has an extra PCI-Express multiplier from the NF200 chipset, but x8 vs x16 doesn't make much difference at all.
Originally Posted by Bindibadgi I'll fish out the numbers, but I didn't put them in.
Null - two x16 or four x8. Normal for the 790FX. The Skulltrail has an extra PCI-Express multiplier from the NF200 chipset, but x8 vs x16 doesn't make much difference at all.
ok, well it was to my understanding that you cant use a full pci-e gfx card in a pcie x16 /x8 electrical because its only half the performance...
lol. I agree with you Richard tho and I was only kidding about the old FSB thing! ;) 1333FSB is still plenty esp with the large L2 cache on the Intels.
I currently run an Intel Yorkfield QX9650 and it is super with no problems. Just curious to try out AMD on my second folding/ part time gaming rig to see how it compares in day to day operation. Good luck with the PR's and competition.
That board is gorgeous, I wish other companies would put as much consideration into the visuals of their boards.
Yellow/Orange/Red headers on a Black/Blue board? Fail.
Kudos to MSI for making a board that doesn't look like it was put together from the scrapings of Foxconn's factory floor.
Originally Posted by D-Cyph3r £140 for a top end AM3 board.... Jesus AMD really are offering a much more credit crunch-friendly platform option over Intel.
I have to admit - I haven't even taken the cheaper GD65 (790GX) out the box yet... :o
Originally Posted by null_x86 ok, well it was to my understanding that you cant use a full pci-e gfx card in a pcie x16 /x8 electrical because its only half the performance...
x16/x8 at PCI-E 2.0 spec is ~1-0.5FPS difference. I got the slots wrong the first time because they are all the same colour and rechecked my results.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tejas lol. I agree with you Richard tho and I was only kidding about the old FSB thing! ;) 1333FSB is still plenty esp with the large L2 cache on the Intels.
I currently run an Intel Yorkfield QX9650 and it is super with no problems. Just curious to try out AMD on my second folding/ part time gaming rig to see how it compares in day to day operation. Good luck with the PR's and competition.
I better get back to work myself! :)
Actually higher FSB = better memory write/copy performance so the more the merrier.
Originally Posted by Bindibadgi I'll fish out the numbers, but I didn't put them in.
Null - two x16 or four x8. Normal for the 790FX. The Skulltrail has an extra PCI-Express multiplier from the NF200 chipset, but x8 vs x16 doesn't make much difference at all.
ok, well it was to my understanding that you cant use a full pci-e gfx card in a pcie x16 /x8 electrical because its only half the performance...
pci-e 2.0 slot in 8x mode same speed as an PCI-e 1.0 16x slot, most video cards at the time only need PCI-e 1.0 8x, even with the GTX295 as it only copys the data to one video GPU the SLI built into the GTX295 does the copy command over to the other GPU
Nice review, wish i could afford an upgrade to Socket AM3 at the minute :(
There's a nice article here http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/pci-express-2.0,1915-11.html which shows that fps doesn't really drop-off significantly on pcie 2.0 until you drop down to x4 speed at higher resolutions, and even then some games won't be affected.
Originally Posted by leexgx pci-e 2.0 slot in 8x mode same speed as an PCI-e 1.0 16x slot, most video cards at the time only need PCI-e 1.0 8x, even with the GTX295 as it only copys the data to one video GPU the SLI built into the GTX295 does the copy command over to the other GPU
so basically, if i am understanding you correctly, you could use this board for 3/4 way SLI?
Comments 1 to 26 of 47
Nice review :P
Well done on working on a Bank Holiday too. I am as well so I know how you feel/ felt!
:) I still prefer Intel's tbh - feels more natural to me, but it takes time to learn the ropes of feeling of a new architecture so I encourage patience ;)
No holiday for me right now - spent the last 2 hours doing PRs and helping organise an upcoming competition :( (Also, Tim probably spent about 3hrs reading it this morning too :P poor sod haha)
The board layout for this board is one of the best ive ever seen. Despite the mention of the northbridge/drmos heatsink getting a bit warm, its in an ideal position, and the combo heatsink frees up more room for the expansion slot (something that seems to be an issue on the x58 boards).
other thing was the SB750 sata ports were tested, as was the JMB362 esata port.... but not the JMB322. You seemed to suggest that the two jmicron chips are the same, or at least give the same performance. Any clarification on that?
I'll fish out the numbers, but I didn't put them in.
Null - two x16 or four x8. Normal for the 790FX. The Skulltrail has an extra PCI-Express multiplier from the NF200 chipset, but x8 vs x16 doesn't make much difference at all.
ok, well it was to my understanding that you cant use a full pci-e gfx card in a pcie x16 /x8 electrical because its only half the performance...
I'm dying for AMD to release their 6-core CPUs so I can warrant an upgrade!
I currently run an Intel Yorkfield QX9650 and it is super with no problems. Just curious to try out AMD on my second folding/ part time gaming rig to see how it compares in day to day operation. Good luck with the PR's and competition.
I better get back to work myself! :)
Yellow/Orange/Red headers on a Black/Blue board? Fail.
Kudos to MSI for making a board that doesn't look like it was put together from the scrapings of Foxconn's factory floor.
http://anfi-tec.de/forenbilder/09.04.19/4.JPG
http://anfi-tec.de/forenbilder/09.04.19/2.JPG
I have to admit - I haven't even taken the cheaper GD65 (790GX) out the box yet... :o
Andreoid - Gorgeous mate!! Looking lovely.
x16/x8 at PCI-E 2.0 spec is ~1-0.5FPS difference. I got the slots wrong the first time because they are all the same colour and rechecked my results.
Actually higher FSB = better memory write/copy performance so the more the merrier.
pci-e 2.0 slot in 8x mode same speed as an PCI-e 1.0 16x slot, most video cards at the time only need PCI-e 1.0 8x, even with the GTX295 as it only copys the data to one video GPU the SLI built into the GTX295 does the copy command over to the other GPU
There's a nice article here http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/pci-express-2.0,1915-11.html which shows that fps doesn't really drop-off significantly on pcie 2.0 until you drop down to x4 speed at higher resolutions, and even then some games won't be affected.
so basically, if i am understanding you correctly, you could use this board for 3/4 way SLI?
No.
You can't use SLI on a board with a AMD chipset.
However, you can run crossfire with 4 cards.
You can run 4 nvidia cards as well, but they will work separately, not in sli.
meh, so 4way crossfire?
Yes, that will work.
Nice! Got to remember this when I get my vacation money..