Published on 2nd January 2010 by
Originally Posted by Symanb"The ViewSonic was as free of input lag as the virtually lag-free Dell UltraSharp 3008-WFP."
I think it should be the Dell UltraSharp 3007-WFP.
Originally Posted by EltonI'm sure there's a Dell 3008-WFP, but I can't remember if BT has that one or the 3007.
The first thing I noticed: Crappy stand, looked hella flimsy.
Also tron: 16:10 monitors are much better, you get those extra pixels and everything isn't fat!
3D has come and gone so many times from the early 1980s
Originally Posted by levellerAs soon as they provide vibrant colours, min 200hz refresh, 2560x1600 then they're on to a 3D winner.
Originally Posted by CobaltA 120Hz 1080p 22" screen is something I could really go for at the moment. I don't care about 3D, but having the higher refresh rate would make me feel like I hadn't wasted the money on the rest of the computer, considering that most games that I play regularly I get 100+ fps. The only problem right now is getting a decent panel.
24" in 1080p doesn't make as much sense to me due to the poorer pixel pitch, which being a physicist I always considered a more important measure than what everyone calls "resolution".
You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.
9th February 2016
8th February 2016
4th February 2016
© Copyright bit-tech