Published on 17th March 2017 by
Originally Posted by GeorgeK^I'm sure I remember reading a while back that they brought in a new test setup and so had to effectively start from scratch with the results starting at the 1080. I'm happy to be corrected if I'm wrong however.
Originally Posted by TheMadDutchDudeYou can't have skewed results, or else your credibility becomes questionable. You have to draw the line and start somewhere. I'd have thought that BT would at least keep a few of their samples behind so that they can retest, especially in these particular circumstances.
Maybe the results are coming at some point...?
Originally Posted by FizzbanI really don't want to appear like an arse, but I just might anyway.
You only compare the new cards to a Titan (pascal) or an AMD R9 Fury X. What about the previous generation? I am sitting here with a 970, but all your reviews aren't applicable to me as you don't include a reference to the previous generation.
So what am I to take away from this? X card is faster than X card..well yeah..but unless you provide the last generation of cards what do those charts even mean to most of us? Nothing, is what they mean.
Originally Posted by Mr_MistoffeleesIs it really that difficult, if you want to know how the newly tested cards compare with older hardware, to look-up old test results and make a rough comparison? There is plenty of information out there, make some effort yourself.
You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.
26th April 2017
25th April 2017
24th April 2017
© Copyright bit-tech