Published on 23rd December 2013 by
Originally Posted by Corky42Just think if the big three could actually work together and share some technological advancements, i cant help thinking all this proprietary stuff like Mantel, G-Sync, etc is holding back wide spread adoption of some advancements to the determent of us end users.
Originally Posted by ZeDestructorAMD claims Mantle is open, but I have yet to see any docs, so as far as I'm concerned it's proprietary, plus it will be very heavily optimised for AMD GPUs in its first incarnation at least, so it will take time for Nvidia to catch up. Add to that that Nvidia is very, very confident in it's OpenGL implementations and you can see why they have been generally apathetic so far.
G-Sync, while proprietary to Nvidia right now, should be fairly easy for AMD to implement as well should Nvidia open the spec: It uses a standard DisplayPort interface together with an off-the-shelf FPGA (running admittedly very custom logic) in the monitor. I do believe Nvidia will license it fairly soon, much like it eventually licensed SLI to non-nvidia chipsets back in the day. If that fails, AMD will implement their own version, and then after a generation or two of feet-dragging, they'll make it a damn standard and we'll all move on.
All in all, there's nothing so proprietary that it can't be opened up right now. Just give them time to make money of exclusivity and then watch the dust settle.
Originally Posted by law99I guess this is something we'll need to pay out the arse for to really appreciate.
Although this monitor is capable of running at 144Hz, to keep our testing more general and realistic we did most of our testing at 60Hz.
Originally Posted by ch424Quote:Although this monitor is capable of running at 144Hz, to keep our testing more general and realistic we did most of our testing at 60Hz.
I'd have thought it's more interesting to compare G-Sync to a 144Hz standard monitor with V-sync enabled, no? In both cases you have to spend a lot of money, so it would be interesting to see if G-Sync makes gameplay significantly better than a regular 144Hz monitor. Did you guys play with that at all?
Originally Posted by ch424Sorry, I didn't quite make my point clear - if "most people" have a standard 60Hz screen now, should they pay the little extra to upgrade to 144Hz, or should they pay even more extra to get G-Sync? Is it worth the difference?
Originally Posted by BedeForgive my ignorance on screen tech, but I find it astonishing that VBLANK is still a thing for non-CRT screens. Anyone know why it still exists?
Originally Posted by alialiasSeems like a logical move to me, the vast majority of things in computers are synchronised by clocks, why not the monitor too?
AMD has been relatively silent on the topic of NVIDIA’s variable refresh rate G-Sync technology since its announcement last year. At this year’s CES however, AMD gave me a short demo of its version of the technology.
Originally Posted by Corky42Is this AMD's answer to G-sync ?
You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.
27th May 2016
26th May 2016
19th May 2016
© Copyright bit-tech