bit-tech.net

AMD Radeon HD 7970 3GB Review

Comments 101 to 122 of 122

Reply
Paradigm Shifter 29th December 2011, 13:06 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waynio
:'( The dawn of the uber expensive GPU.

£500 Sheesh, well there goes my GPU upgrade system, I'd need 2 580's to raise the cash for 1 of these definitely not getting a single GPU at such a bloated price, this new ATI card (sorry will always be ATI in my mind :)) is good but not £500 good :D.

If it's at all possible, I'd really like Bit-Tech to ask AMD whether this is AMD policy for the price to be this high in the UK, or whether it's simply (r)e-tailers abusing early adopters.
sub routine 31st December 2011, 13:42 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paradigm Shifter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waynio
:'( The dawn of the uber expensive GPU.
.
If it's at all possible, I'd really like Bit-Tech to ask AMD whether this is AMD policy for the price to be this high in the UK, or whether it's simply (r)e-tailers abusing early adopters.


If it is, depending on the price point of Nvidias forthcoming offering it would make me pretty resentful of ATI if I had my foot in the door to start with.
And if it`s just the internet bandits cashing in surely ATI would want to have a word with them from 2nd hand bad publicity this could cause them? Something like that could make me swear off them for life (or at least a few generations).

I`m waiting and watching to see what all happens as I NEED an upgrade but i dont really want to throw my money away. I think if they`d adopted the 300- just over 300 with designer coolers o`clocks on them they could have cleaned up a hell of alot more than they will with such a high pre-ported starting price.
smartkid 31st December 2011, 20:16 Quote
Still waiting for gtx 600/700
MjFrosty 3rd January 2012, 13:41 Quote
These cards scale REALLY well by the looks of it which is another thing to consider...I'll be waiting for Nvidias offering but even so, this card offers awesome performance for anyone wanting to upgrade now.
GravitySmacked 3rd January 2012, 14:32 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by BurningFeetMan


When reviewing hardware, please benchmark it against not only last seasons models, but also the most popular currently used video cards out there, at this time of writing;

ATI Radeon HD 5770
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
ATI Radeon HD 5850
ATI Radeon HD 5870
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

This would benefit a large portion of readers who don't own the latest video card, making the results much more personal and useful to them . You don't have to cater for every video card out there, but it'd be nice to see the popular older cards always kept in your bench marks so that people can see the difference.

+1
Parge 3rd January 2012, 17:16 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by BurningFeetMan
I wish review sites would consider the statistics of hardware surveys, such as Valve's hardware survey which I've linked below, before choosing various video card makes and models for benchmarking comparisons.

http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/directx/

and this one;

http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/videocard/


When reviewing hardware, please benchmark it against not only last seasons models, but also the most popular currently used video cards out there, at this time of writing;

ATI Radeon HD 5770
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
ATI Radeon HD 5850
ATI Radeon HD 5870
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

This would benefit a large portion of readers who don't own the latest video card, making the results much more personal and useful to them . You don't have to cater for every video card out there, but it'd be nice to see the popular older cards always kept in your bench marks so that people can see the difference.

/rant

If any readers agree with this, cut & paste it onto every review/benchmark website until our voices are heard!

/revolution

Or you could use Anandtechs Bench section of their website and compare your current card to almost any other card out there. Yes?
woods 3rd January 2012, 18:01 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by metarinka
I'm waiting for the 7950 or whatever is one step below this card. I have a 5850 that works well but it's starting to show it's age. Guess I'll be waiting a few more months though

Me to but as I am only using 1680 1050 19" I might wait until I upgrade my screen
GravitySmacked 3rd January 2012, 18:32 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parge
Or you could use Anandtechs Bench section of their website and compare your current card to almost any other card out there. Yes?

Or Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy but it would be nice for Bit-Tech (who's opinion I value more than most others) to chuck in some older cards, CPU's etc to give benchmarks for older kit.
Horizon 3rd January 2012, 19:17 Quote
It would've made more sense to bring back XTX, than FX

79xx XTX/XT
78xx Pro
77xx LE
MjFrosty 4th January 2012, 10:30 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horizon
It would've made more sense to bring back XTX, than FX

79xx XTX/XT
78xx Pro
77xx LE

God no...
Sloth 4th January 2012, 21:38 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horizon
It would've made more sense to bring back XTX, than FX

79xx XTX/XT
78xx Pro
77xx LE
I can just see it now:

XFX Radeon HD7970 XTX 4G LTE Vapor-X SuperOC Pro 3GB

...with free copy of Batman: Arkham City!
lilgoth89 4th January 2012, 22:37 Quote
and a glass of water for getting it all right in one breath :D
Marvin-HHGTTG 4th January 2012, 23:06 Quote
Price drop from $525 to $475 apparently. It remains to be seen whether this saving is passed to consumers or not. The target RRP of $550 has not been altered as of yet.

Source
loftie 5th January 2012, 12:47 Quote
Another 2GB 3GB mistake on the overclocking section

"6fps higher than the HD 7970 2GB’s stock performance".

I look forward to seeing the 7770, as that's what i'll probably upgrade to. However since AMD changed the naming scheme, and the numbers are supposed to represent the same performance as cards of previous generations with the same model, does this mean the 7770 will offer the same performance as the 6770/5770 and for the true mid level performance should be a number slightly higher?

Why did they have to change a perfectly fine naming system.... :(
bogie170 5th January 2012, 13:20 Quote
Can't find any prices anywhere, no pre-orders anywhere to be found, scan overclockers, etc.
FantasticGanton 5th January 2012, 23:07 Quote
Hi just wanted some thoughts please guys.
Got a new overclocked bundle from scan this week.
Cpu,motherboard and ram. I have a gtx580 was wondering go for the gtx 590
or wait a couple of months and see what the new nvidias are like maybe even getting a sli setup.
Marvin-HHGTTG 6th January 2012, 01:57 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by loftie
Another 2GB 3GB mistake on the overclocking section

"6fps higher than the HD 7970 2GB’s stock performance".

I look forward to seeing the 7770, as that's what i'll probably upgrade to. However since AMD changed the naming scheme, and the numbers are supposed to represent the same performance as cards of previous generations with the same model, does this mean the 7770 will offer the same performance as the 6770/5770 and for the true mid level performance should be a number slightly higher?

Why did they have to change a perfectly fine naming system.... :(

The 7770 will fill the same slot as the 6770/5770, and the 6770 has been released as the OEM-only 7670. Thus, expect 6870-ish performance from the 7770 and 6970-ish performance from the 7870.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bogie170
Can't find any prices anywhere, no pre-orders anywhere to be found, scan overclockers, etc.

You won't find pre-orders on most hardware. Never sure why, but I think it's to allow last minute price changes and so on.
loftie 7th January 2012, 11:13 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvin-HHGTTG
The 7770 will fill the same slot as the 6770/5770, and the 6770 has been released as the OEM-only 7670. Thus, expect 6870-ish performance from the 7770 and 6970-ish performance from the 7870..

Sounds good to me, but seems like they've reverted to the older naming system then :(
Speed 9th January 2012, 14:10 Quote
Why oh why was a GTX580 3GB not in the benchmarks?! Seems a major oversight especially at 1600p.

Want to see 7970 3GB CF vs GTX580 3GB SLI at 1600p in something like BF3 Ultra with everything maxed out, that will give them a real good test.
andrew8200m 9th January 2012, 14:18 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed
Why oh why was a GTX580 3GB not in the benchmarks?! Seems a major oversight especially at 1600p.

Want to see 7970 3GB CF vs GTX580 3GB SLI at 1600p in something like BF3 Ultra with everything maxed out, that will give them a real good test.

OcUK have done this.

The customers asked, OcUK delivered.
Speed 9th January 2012, 14:34 Quote
Good to know just surprised Bit Tech didn't put a GTX 580 3GB in their tests.
warmbit 10th April 2012, 12:00 Quote
Here is the link to an interesting overview performance Radeon 7970 of 5 Web sites competing GTX580 and 6970.

Analysis of the results of the Radeon 7970 in 18 games and 6 resolutions:
http://translate.google.pl/translate?hl=pl&sl=pl&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwarmbit.blogspot.com%2F2011%2F12%2Fanaliza-wynikow-amd-radeon-7970-w-18.html


You will know the average relationship rates between these interest cards and you will find out which graphics card is better in the game and resolution.
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



Discuss in the forums