Published on 8th November 2011 by
Originally Posted by PargeTime to get BF3 on the test bench! Its the only game that is going to push the higher end cards.
Originally Posted by nathandanielmorrisIMO this thing looks class.
Originally Posted by andrew8200mThis card is over 2x the speed on average with ULTRA settings and 4AA than the 1GB card in BF3.
Reviews need tests updating as they are providing a false sense of security to those thinkling about a 2GB card over a 1GB card with the illusion a 1GB will do.
Originally Posted by KrikkitCitation needed methinks. :)
Not saying it's wrong, but something concrete over heresay please.
Originally Posted by andrew8200mWe got MSI to do the testing for us who had the opinion of "cant be" only to find out it it was.
Originally Posted by xaser04This still needs to be backed up with some form of evidence.
Originally Posted by murrayntId say that extra 1gb would shine in BF3
Originally Posted by t.y.wanWhy would you not get a 6950 DirectCU II... It's even 1 pound cheaper... and the performance is WAY WAY better - -" (Price from overclock.net not overclockers.co.uk)
2GB of ram in a mid range card which is designed to run games at 1050p and maybe 1080p is already pretty stupid... let alone the price... At 220 pounds, you should really just add 30 pounds for the KPA2 GTX 570...
If you are looking for quiet, just get a better case ~_~"
Originally Posted by andrew8200mGoogle is all you need ;)
You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.
1st December 2016
30th November 2016
28th November 2016
© Copyright bit-tech