bit-tech.net

First Look: Nvidia 3-way SLI on nForce 680i

Comments 26 to 50 of 66

Reply
Goty 13th December 2007, 17:57 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jodiuh
Quote:
Originally Posted by yakyb
just have to wiat to see how 780i holds up with a 9450 now!!
I'm a bit sad in that a new board for my system has to be purchased this weekend. I'm going to miss out on the 780i by a week! :(
Quote:
Originally Posted by FaSMaN
...how can Nvidia not allow the 8800gt to go 3-way,its a budget card that just about everybody can afford...
3x $250 = $750
3x $500 = $1500
ATI has nothing to compete, NV's got us by the balls. :(

CrossfireX, enabled on the 790 chipset (whenever that gets here).
Tim S 13th December 2007, 18:00 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunsmith
how did you power the 3rd card? i wasnt aware of any psu's that had more then 4x PCI-X power lines?

There are some, surprisingly... we've used Thermaltake's Toughpower 1500W unit... comes with 4x 6-pin and 4x 8-pin PCI-E connectors (with two 8-pin to 6-pin adapters). :)
wuyanxu 13th December 2007, 18:34 Quote
so to play Crysis at very high, i'll need 3x 8800Ultra in Tri Sli or a single graphics card with 3x the processing power of current graphics card to have a playable framerate :O

damn, there goes my dream of maxing Crysis when i upgrade to Geforce series 9
FaSMaN 13th December 2007, 19:15 Quote
Sorry about that Jodiuh should have said most instead of everyone :P but still $250 is still better than $1500 :D
FaSMaN 13th December 2007, 19:17 Quote
sorry thats $750 is better than $1500
rupbert 13th December 2007, 19:58 Quote
I'm all for pushing technology forwards, but this is just silly.
DrewBear11 13th December 2007, 20:02 Quote
Are you having a laugh

The sheer awesomeness of this is astounding.

3 x 8800ULTRA and a bad ass intel quad core and it will be amazing.
MrWillyWonka 13th December 2007, 20:22 Quote
OUCH to the electricity bill. Any chance it *might* remotely be available to some other cards?

Having 3 cards means you have no room for anything else, isn't it time for taller motherboards with space to actually put your sound and TV cards?
chrisb2e9 13th December 2007, 20:47 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWillyWonka
OUCH to the electricity bill. Any chance it *might* remotely be available to some other cards?

Having 3 cards means you have no room for anything else, isn't it time for taller motherboards with space to actually put your sound and TV cards?

for how tight everything is squeezed in, it would be nice to see a new format with maybe an extra inch or two.
my 1950 pro is a tight fit, I dont think that 3 8800's would even make it in.
Phil Rhodes 13th December 2007, 21:04 Quote
You need antialiasing at 2560x1600?
duc 13th December 2007, 21:11 Quote
Hmmm, £1600 worth of hardware still only gets you roughtly 40fps in Crysis (max eye candy) and 32ish in Vista.

Ohh..the madness
dragontail 13th December 2007, 21:23 Quote
Anyone else wanna see someone water cool these bad boys... then connect the pipes to their central heating?
flaunt 13th December 2007, 21:31 Quote
This is pretty awesome but something seems a little odd about going down the path of multiple GPUs while Intel is already going the route of multiple core CPUs. Seems to me the burden of heavy graphics processing could be shifted back over to the CPU. That would be a much more economically viable solution than telling people to throw an extra $700 graphics card into their system whenever a new card-busting game emerges. If the burden were on the CPU, then each new CPU generation containing a larger number of cores would theoretically result in automatic performance increases in games. Sure there would be inefficiencies using a "regular" CPU core to process graphics, but think about the scaling. If you had an 8 core CPU perhaps 4 cores could be devoted to processing graphics in parallel and some of the inefficiencies might be mitigated by the shared cache between the cores. I realize there are many hardware-level efficiencies built in to graphics cards, but I'm a little puzzled that Intel hasn't atleast explored the possibilities since they would stand to gain quite a bit.
nemesis80 13th December 2007, 21:36 Quote
sound card goes where?
Icy EyeG 13th December 2007, 22:08 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Article
Ménage à trois – why?
Because we can!

I ROFLed at work when I saw the title....

Don't ever quote it without proper context!
The_Beast 13th December 2007, 22:34 Quote
they look cool but I don't think I'll be getting tri-sli anytime soon
JaredC01 13th December 2007, 23:09 Quote
Be nice to have... Would finally give me the ability to view games the way they're meant to be on a 30"...
StormPwn 13th December 2007, 23:42 Quote
Tim S, is there any chance you could upload the timedemo you used to test Crysis?

I'd very much like to run my own tests to compare :)

thank you
bahgger 14th December 2007, 04:08 Quote
And finally, we see our graphics subsystem take up more physical space that the motherboard in terms of PCB space and heatsinks! We have a winner! :D This looks so awesome and I only wish I had the money to procure it :P
Woodstock 14th December 2007, 04:09 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by zr_ox
I was sure the early reports were indicating that this would only be possible on the 780i.

This is interesting since a simple driver will enable it, that begs the question then "why bother with the 780i" since it really brings little extra to the table, and at what cost?

a little extra? i would say that support for 45nm cpus is a bloody big thing.

looks like im not the only person thinking about sound cards lol

is there any reason why we dont have multi core gpus
Goty 14th December 2007, 05:43 Quote
You could almost think of current GPUs as being multi-cored if you count each shader unit as a core, but the main reason we don't have true multi-core GPUs right now would most certainly have to be yields. As massive as these chips are, getting two on the same piece of silicon functioning perfectly would certainly be a chore.

Another good reason would be thermals.
outlawaol 14th December 2007, 06:58 Quote
When I built my old rig, about a year and a half ago, I was 'admittedly going to get another card down the road'. But the industry changed, my setup was completely out dated and getting another card was virtually impossible (and would be outdone with a card that would cost the same as an addition card for a SLI setup I would've used)

I think SLI is a bit overrated really. People constantly want to have the best. Its near madness. I built my 'new rig' just this past sept. Stepped up to a 8800gtx (thanks evga) and now the 9xxx series cards will be launching in Feb. New gfx, new cpu, new ram.... new computer altogether! ddr2? NA! Now its ddr3! All faster and what not! I'll prolly never SLI, it just seems to be a gimmick now to sell additional gpu's that will be useless in less then a year.

I love PC gaming, but dang... there is some economical sense to consoles....
Nictron 14th December 2007, 07:48 Quote
For every 10 games I buy on PC I can buy a 8800GT, console games are way too expensive! That is here in South Africa though don't know how the prises are in other countries.
Jamie 14th December 2007, 09:07 Quote
We'll look back on this in a few years time and laugh... I hope!
Tim S 14th December 2007, 09:17 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by StormPwn
Tim S, is there any chance you could upload the timedemo you used to test Crysis?

I'd very much like to run my own tests to compare :)

thank you

As much as I would love to share my timedemo with you, I don't distribute my timedemos because they can get into the wrong hands - i.e. ATI/Nvidia's driver optimisation team. The result would be potentially inflated performance in the exact portion (and camera position) of the game that I am testing, which doesn't tell you guys anything. I will tell you where it was recorded though... the Harbor level.
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



Discuss in the forums