Published on 9th May 2006 by
Originally Posted by IonixIf there's a way to unlock the extra pipelines then I might just get this card along with a Conroe in the summer :)
Originally Posted by ContingenctPlanI'd imagine that the extra pipes are laser cut?
In some areas, the R580-based Radeon X1900GT is faster than the card it is replacing. However, in other, less shader-intense titles like Day of Defeat: Source, the R520-based Radeon X1800XT is the faster of the two. This can be attributed to the architectural differences between R520 and R580.
Originally Posted by OmegaREDMy only complaint with this review is the X1800XT itself was not even tested yet is referred to in the conclusion
How can we draw proper conclusions about X1900GT when its replacement isn't there to compare? I am especially interested to see if the Sapphire X1800XT 512mb would have come out on top.
Is it too late to add that card in or do an update to the review?
F.E.A.R., Oblivion, Call Of Duty 2, I feel that the X1800XT is a slower card.
Originally Posted by chemoa 7900gt is afterall basically a 7800 GTX
Originally Posted by bigzThey have the same amount of memory (GeForce 7800 GTX 256 only has 256MB of memory and I think that was what he was referring to).
You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.
27th June 2016
23rd June 2016
21st June 2016
© Copyright bit-tech