bit-tech.net

AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE C3 Review

Comments 26 to 34 of 34

Reply
[USRF]Obiwan 4th November 2009, 15:06 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by trig

are you trying to be funny?

i doubt that's real, and if it is legit, my e8400 broke 10.2 seconds on the same test, on air...lolz

No it is completely legit. Its a bench made by Neil Breems (Brimzu) a respected overclocker. In case you did not know. Anyway you can look it up here

And yes I was joking because 6Ghz was on LN2. :D

Anyway my point was that a I750 gives a little more bang for the same money. Or I read the BT benches wrong in the article. So cheap has nothing to do with it. I then compared some basic components. And there was not much difference. Then I thought Bindi did not understand my post and I tried to explain it but..

well... :(
Quote:
Because your Tyan board is a workstation-server using specific software. We always try to test with what people generally use, not specific scenarios, working to budgets not core-e-peen.

Thats understandable. But don't you want to know what Adobe Premiere does with dual and quad cores? aah never mind. I am just curious.
Evildead666 4th November 2009, 16:28 Quote
For a high end cooling test, I would personally use a top-down cooler to get the heat out of the socket area also.
I don't believe a Tower cooler can cool the CPU and its socket better than any top-down cooler.

I got my Celeron 325J at 90/65nm to 4.1GHz stable with an SI-128SE and a very loud Papst 120mm fan.
All the voltage circuits were very pleased with the extreme airflow.....my ears weren't, but then again I could hear it loudly behind a closed door...
trig 4th November 2009, 18:25 Quote
it would have to be ln2 lol...but im amazed he couldnt crack 10 or even 9 seconds with a 6.2 ghz quad...we understand what your saying, just pointing out how that doesnt come across on that post...
WildThing 4th November 2009, 19:45 Quote
Great article Bindi, thanks! I think this pretty much means I'll be getting an i5 750 then. I was holding out for AMD, just in case this 965 BE C3 was something a bit more special, but it seems for not much more I could do better with Intel. Also, considering I have no need for all the PCI-E lanes and extra memory bandwidth of the 1366 platform, I think 1156 with an i5 750 is the way forward for me.

However I will probably wait for the November Buyers Guide before I start ordering bits. Can you tell me if/when the guide will be out?

Cheers
OWNED66 5th November 2009, 07:48 Quote
Another failure.
Horizon 5th November 2009, 07:59 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by OWNED66
Another failure.

according to what standards?
Bindibadgi 5th November 2009, 08:18 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildThing
However I will probably wait for the November Buyers Guide before I start ordering bits. Can you tell me if/when the guide will be out?

Cheers

No problem!

Nov Buyers guide will not change much. Only cost of memory will shift things a little. It's due out next week (I'm starting today)
unclean 9th November 2009, 16:39 Quote
Wait, maybe I've gone insane; are the clocks/settings of the overclocked i5 and i7 not mentioned anywhere during this review?

If not, surely this is pretty relevant? :-/
DarrenH 13th May 2010, 14:52 Quote
It's 6 months since this review and I for one am building a system with the 965 BE with an ATI 5770. This fits my budget perfectly and looking at many reviews around the CPU is a great performer at a brilliant price.

The 7/10 is one of the lowest scores I've seen but it's good to get a balanced viewpoint I guess.
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



Discuss in the forums

More About...