bit-tech.net

Lynnfield PCI-Express Gaming Performance

Comments 51 to 55 of 55

Reply
wuyanxu 15th September 2009, 13:32 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by friskies
What if you overclock both the PCI express frequency and the QPI frequency on the P55??? Would that bring it up to X58 levels?
that would mean overclock Bclk, the system clock, which would invalidate p55 vs x58 results.

i've read to lower QPI clock when overclocking, but i never did, and still managed 215Mhz bclk on my Asus p55 deluxe board, 205Mhz stable (with lowered CPU clock, of course)
glenster 16th September 2009, 05:33 Quote
Another consideration for comparison is that the Core i7 960 3.2GHz is due Q4 2009 for $562--see Wikipedia > Nehalem > 45 nm processor architecture. Another site says it's due Oct.18.
stixx 16th September 2009, 18:04 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skiddywinks
As has been pointed out, this article (as much as I enjoyed it), really needs a DDR3 X48/X38 board running a single and multi GPU setup.

The results are biased in how much better Bloomfield and Lynnfield peform when they both have DDR3, whereas P45 is only using DDR2.

Owning a Rampage Extreme, the results don't really tell me how much better i5/i7 really are than what I have now.

agree
oneguypc 23rd September 2009, 09:13 Quote
i just have the same results, so confuse:( why 8x8x have good as performance as 16x16x???:(:(:(
spec:
- P55: 8GB PC12800, HD4890 1GB CFX
- X58: 6GB PC12800, HD4890 1GB CFX

http://img148.imageshack.us/i/chart1.jpg/
impar 23rd September 2009, 09:31 Quote
Greetings!
Quote:
Originally Posted by oneguypc
i just have the same results, so confuse:( why 8x8x have good as performance as 16x16x???:(:(:(
The benchmark you are using doesnt need more than x16?
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



Discuss in the forums

More About...