Originally Posted by Baz "Hey, did your case get slightly larger?"
"Noooooo"
Must. resist. changing. a. word.
Loved the R3, surprised this didn't get premium considering the price. IB chips do need more cooling, or a razor blade, but what great features for £80
Maybe it's just the photos, but it kinda looks cheap. On a less subjective note, it would be nice to find out how well sound deadening materials work. Fancy doing an investigation? :D
Quote:
Originally Posted by C-Sniper WE DEMAND A FULL LOADED FAN TEST!!!
Also this, some manufactures seem to only put in the bear minimum number of fans. Which works for me since I either have a pile of fans, or I'll want to buy the fans I want.
Does it have more space behind the motherboard tray? It's the only fault I can find with my R3. I can cable manage in my R3 but it's hard because the side panel is a bit close to the motherboard tray.
Well done review Harry. My only nag is the cooling comparison to Corsair's Carbide. Fractal's "Define" series has always been designed for "Silent" computing, with front insulated bezel doors and exterior, while the Carbide has an "Open Air" design. Two entirely different enthusiast markets.
The R4 is a hybrid of the R3 and Arc Midi chassis. It utilizes the best features from both of these cases.
Originally Posted by The_Beast Does it have more space behind the motherboard tray? It's the only fault I can find with my R3. I can cable manage in my R3 but it's hard because the side panel is a bit close to the motherboard tray.
Indeed, this is the only real criticism I have with my R3. I only really appreciated how annoying it was to cable route properly after building up my wife's system in the Arc Mini.
The removable drive bays are also a major plus as height aside the Arc Mini is a much design from a GPU fitting/ cooling aspect when compared to the R3.
I say well done to Fractal for responding to the ever changing requirements of enthusiasts.
They have:
- added support for roof mounted all in one CPU coolers (or maybe slim radiators)
- made the drive cage(s) removable
- improved dust filters
- improved support for tall CPU coolers
- improved cable routing grommets that everyone moans about
- improved 2.5" HD/SSD support
All in under two years since the R3 was released. How many other case manufacturers are so responsive to their market?
Of course I would love to know what teh cooling performance is like fully loaded but that will come, if not from bit-tech then from t'interwebs.
@Necrow - Hehe, I think this is what the P182/3 should have been with a sensible drive layout, better cable management and no (silly imo) PSU divider.
Certainly gives me plenty to think about for my first upcoming quiet build. R4, Corsair 550D or (maybe) Antec P280? Looks-wise I think the Corsair wins, but the R4 is cheaper and has better cooling. The R4 it is then, and spend my savings on upgrading the other components.
Originally Posted by Fingers66 Bit-Tech always just use the fans supplied, two in this case(!).
The CPU cooler was the Gelid Tranquilo they use with their test kit.
I assumed as much, but wanted to check :P I'd be curious to see the heat difference with the side fan on, since the GPU temp seemed to let it down
Quote:
Originally Posted by billysielu It's at the bottom of the graph and you give it 84%.. right..
I don't really think it's a 'cooling' case, which is why cooling isnt amazing. It's more of a silent case, like the P180 from antec. It gets 84% because it's built well, has good features, and offers good value considering ( see 550D ). The P180 etc offers similar features, last I saw it it was over £100.
Considering the delta Ts, I assume the GPU hit about 80-90C on low, and the CPU about 70-80C?
The case deserves 84% because of its overall features and price, yes its temps aint the best but then its not aimed to be a high airflow case..its designed to be a quiet case.
And the airflow can always be improved, quite easily, if the buyer needs better cooling. But surely most people who are seriously considering buying this case are as, if not more, interested in it's USP of being a 'silent' case, in which case you almost always have to take something of a hit when it comes to cooling/temps.
For those wondering about cable management space, Fractal have mentioned this on their website.
Quote:
Wider case body that allows for improved cable routing behind the motherboard now 26mm wide
Quote:
26mm of space for cable routing behind the motherboard plate
When they say wider they mean it as well; the R3 was 207mm wide, the R4 is 232mm wide.
I've got myself the Define Mini last week and my temps are waaaay better, just because I optes to install 4 fans instead of only usung the two the case was shipped with.
Allthough I do understand that you test the cases with stock-fans delivered and all that, but please do us all a favour and test the case with two intakes and two vents, and then let's see where the case sits in the list.
Even with four fans running at 800-1000RPM the case will be very silent, without sacrificing cooling.
Oh, and the built-quality of Fractals cases is totally awesome imho.
Four iterations of this case and they still haven't managed to use 4 identical case feet. TBH, it's my main gripe with the Define cases. Asymmetrical features like this just turn me off... :(
Originally Posted by jakobfrimmel hmm interesting⦠but I wouldn't wanna stick a high-end pc into that case just from the fear of heat....
Heat is no issue with this case when you use both front-intakes and atleast one of the top-vents. Using a full setup of fans will drop the delta T another 10°C at full speed.
The problem with the method bit-tech is using in their case-reviews is, that they never use a full array, or atleast reasonable amount of fans, but only the little amount of fans delivered by the manufacturer - usually two.
Imho bit-tech should test every case with the same amount of fans and with the same fan-model if possible to show the real capabilities of a case.
The fans delivered by Fractal Design run at max 1200RPM and are low-noise-models. These fans are not ment for maximum cooling and are another factor for the rather mediochre review-result.
So, I wouldn't really take this review into account, but rather ask people who actually use the case and ask about their experiences.
Comments 1 to 25 of 48
Reply"Hey, did your case get slightly larger?"
"Noooooo"
Must. resist. changing. a. word.
Loved the R3, surprised this didn't get premium considering the price. IB chips do need more cooling, or a razor blade, but what great features for £80
WE DEMAND A FULL LOADED FAN TEST!!!
Also this, some manufactures seem to only put in the bear minimum number of fans. Which works for me since I either have a pile of fans, or I'll want to buy the fans I want.
The R4 is a hybrid of the R3 and Arc Midi chassis. It utilizes the best features from both of these cases.
VS45Yhjj4bY
Indeed, this is the only real criticism I have with my R3. I only really appreciated how annoying it was to cable route properly after building up my wife's system in the Arc Mini.
The removable drive bays are also a major plus as height aside the Arc Mini is a much design from a GPU fitting/ cooling aspect when compared to the R3.
They have:
- added support for roof mounted all in one CPU coolers (or maybe slim radiators)
- made the drive cage(s) removable
- improved dust filters
- improved support for tall CPU coolers
- improved cable routing grommets that everyone moans about
- improved 2.5" HD/SSD support
All in under two years since the R3 was released. How many other case manufacturers are so responsive to their market?
Of course I would love to know what teh cooling performance is like fully loaded but that will come, if not from bit-tech then from t'interwebs.
Bit-Tech always just use the fans supplied, two in this case(!).
The CPU cooler was the Gelid Tranquilo they use with their test kit.
Certainly gives me plenty to think about for my first upcoming quiet build. R4, Corsair 550D or (maybe) Antec P280? Looks-wise I think the Corsair wins, but the R4 is cheaper and has better cooling. The R4 it is then, and spend my savings on upgrading the other components.
I assumed as much, but wanted to check :P I'd be curious to see the heat difference with the side fan on, since the GPU temp seemed to let it down
I don't really think it's a 'cooling' case, which is why cooling isnt amazing. It's more of a silent case, like the P180 from antec. It gets 84% because it's built well, has good features, and offers good value considering ( see 550D ). The P180 etc offers similar features, last I saw it it was over £100.
Considering the delta Ts, I assume the GPU hit about 80-90C on low, and the CPU about 70-80C?
For those wondering about cable management space, Fractal have mentioned this on their website.
Allthough I do understand that you test the cases with stock-fans delivered and all that, but please do us all a favour and test the case with two intakes and two vents, and then let's see where the case sits in the list.
Even with four fans running at 800-1000RPM the case will be very silent, without sacrificing cooling.
Oh, and the built-quality of Fractals cases is totally awesome imho.
Heat is no issue with this case when you use both front-intakes and atleast one of the top-vents. Using a full setup of fans will drop the delta T another 10°C at full speed.
The problem with the method bit-tech is using in their case-reviews is, that they never use a full array, or atleast reasonable amount of fans, but only the little amount of fans delivered by the manufacturer - usually two.
Imho bit-tech should test every case with the same amount of fans and with the same fan-model if possible to show the real capabilities of a case.
The fans delivered by Fractal Design run at max 1200RPM and are low-noise-models. These fans are not ment for maximum cooling and are another factor for the rather mediochre review-result.
So, I wouldn't really take this review into account, but rather ask people who actually use the case and ask about their experiences.
-
« Previous
-
1
-
2
-
Next »
Discuss in the forums