bit-tech.net

Bigfoot Networks Killer 2100 Review

Comments 26 to 37 of 37

Reply
azrael- 3rd September 2010, 08:40 Quote
Well, I actually had my eyes on this for a while after not being able to get the Xeno Pro where I live. Not for the "ping boost" or some such nonsense, but because you could have a firewall running on the card. In essence a "hardware" firewall. Something I've been missing since retiring my nForce4 motherboard.

Luckily, Bigfoot Networks saw fit to remove the one redeeming quality of their product by removing this feature (or FNApps in general if I recall correctly).
TWeaK 3rd September 2010, 09:27 Quote
Props to you guys, your testing methods are always very good. I think, particularly with the ping, the results are basically the same when you consider all errors and variables.

What's really good is the software - I'd really like to be able to control where my bandwidth goes. It's a shame they don't just sell it on its own, as it can't be that hard to get it to work with other controllers.
azrael- 3rd September 2010, 10:04 Quote
The cards from Bigfoot aren't just using a network interface chip, but are instead fully fledged computers themselves running some form of embedded Linux. That's more or less what makes the software do the things it does, especially in case of the old FNApps.
Nature 3rd September 2010, 10:30 Quote
Did you test this in the office or work place? You might find a larger disparity with a consumer broadband connection compared to expensive and powerful office one. I would like to know the results of testing under different connections.
Flibblebot 3rd September 2010, 11:46 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Farting Bob
Your speed is largely irrelevent past a set speed. Doesnt matter if you got a 8Mbps connection or a 50Mbps connection. Latency is what makes online gaming (particularly fast FPS games) hit or miss.
That may be true, but latency is still dependent to a large extent on your broadband connection and the route the traffic takes from your connection to the gaming server. These are things that are entirely out of your control, and no flashy network card in your PC will ever affect that.

Added to which, a difference in a few milliseconds (which is within the realms of experimental variance anyway) probably won't affect the average gamer's success at a particular online game unless they're playing at the absolute pinnacle of gaming skill.

Basically, this card is snake oil and is targeted at people who don't know better and have more money than sense.
eddtox 3rd September 2010, 13:36 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flibblebot

Basically, this card is snake oil and is targeted at people who don't know better and have more money than sense.

There's a clue in the name of the company. You're about as likely to see an improvement from this as you are to see a Bigfoot :P
thehippoz 3rd September 2010, 16:39 Quote
we did some tests a long time ago.. we know nic cards use the cpu (this was before duel cores were popular so cpu usage was kind of a big deal in gaming) so we bought an expensive 3M nic that supposedly offloaded

there was no noticeable difference in ping while gaming.. and it used as much cpu as the cheap 5 dollar nic xD
Lockon Stratos 3rd September 2010, 19:13 Quote
I see bigfoot have baked up another fail cake to succed their last fail cake that also failed. if you are concerned about frame rates - you are better off putting that £60-70 towards a more powerful graphics card. looks like they havent learned from their first 'mistake'
Lockon Stratos 3rd September 2010, 21:37 Quote
also - I would just like to add - lowering your ping by a measly 3 or 5 hardly makes any difference at all. I bet a lot of the pro league players just use what comes built in to their motherboard if not they their most likely to have a cheapo semi-decent giga lan card installed. If any pros endorse this product or similar products they are most likely being paid to promote it. similar to what Fata1ity wendel does.
thehippoz 3rd September 2010, 22:05 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by TWeaK
Props to you guys, your testing methods are always very good. I think, particularly with the ping, the results are basically the same when you consider all errors and variables.

What's really good is the software - I'd really like to be able to control where my bandwidth goes. It's a shame they don't just sell it on its own, as it can't be that hard to get it to work with other controllers.

http://www.netlimiter.com/

works great.. used it for years- good to limit browsers over a lan also.. around 115k dl limit on firefox/ie/chrome ect.. then youtube/video can stream uninterrupted, and you can share the bandwidth with everyone else on the lan
nia-desu 4th September 2010, 18:16 Quote
Why does this product exist?

Why does this company still exist?
eddtox 4th September 2010, 23:04 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by nia-desu
Why does this product exist?

Why does this company still exist?

That very same question could be applied to everything from UFO and Bigfoot sightings to world religion and homoeopathy.

Answer: Because people will believe what they want to believe, regardless of the facts, and they will pay for the privilege.
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



Discuss in the forums

More About...