bit-tech.net

First Look at USB 3 Performance

Comments 26 to 34 of 34

Reply
wafflesomd 20th December 2009, 01:39 Quote
"This is because USB 3 adds fives new data lanes to the existing USB 2’s four, allowing for simultaneous upload and download of data"

Why exactly could we not just do that in the first place when they were designing USB.
Saivert 20th December 2009, 23:39 Quote
So USB3 and SATA 6GB/s have somewhat the same bandwidth. But SATA is still better because it uses a different protocol and stack.

USB3 might be good only for the odd external HDD (only for data storage, not for keeping software installed on although it works somewhat).

Also if SATA3 is equivalent to PCIe 1x, might make the DisplayLink technology better if they upgrade to USB3. More bandwidth for external displays.

USB3 attached graphics cards is not going to happen though.
javaman 21st December 2009, 00:06 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by wafflesomd


Why exactly could we not just do that in the first place when they were designing USB.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing
LightningPete 21st December 2009, 00:07 Quote
to be honest fellas, getting usb3 now would be great for a fast usb2 pen drive, it still improves speed rates already versus the current usb2 standard, shaving off nearly 20-30 seconds per mp3/iso... im jumping onboard now tbh
LightningPete 21st December 2009, 00:08 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by LightningPete
to be honest fellas, getting usb3 now would be great for a fast usb2 pen drive, it still improves speed rates already versus the current usb2 standard, shaving off nearly 20-30 seconds per mp3/iso... im jumping onboard now tbh

i meant for harddrives not pen drives lol
xalspaero 23rd December 2009, 18:38 Quote
page 3 says:

"the Corsair SSD comfortably achieves an average write speed on 240MB/sec, so we’ll be able to see whether, and by how much, USB 3 limits this. "

240MB/sec write is wrong, right? Isn't that the read-speed?
Engineeringtech 20th January 2010, 22:28 Quote
Years ago, SCSI moved from 8 bits to 16 bit s (sixteen wires) to increase data bandwidth. The accepted theory back then was that a parallel interface could always work faster than a serial interface. Akin to parallel processing..... Then a few years back we were all suddenly told that serial was the way to go, and could run faster than a parallel interface. Didn't make sense to me.

I think the limiting factor on these buses is how you condition the signal, the quality of the cabling, and the type of detection you use.
GavX 28th January 2010, 14:40 Quote
I'm a little confused, you tested on x38, but ASUS state it is only for P55? Does this mean it will work on any Intel board? Any board at all? Or did you just "persuade" it to run on a non-P55 board?
DarrenH 13th May 2010, 16:43 Quote
I'm buying a motherboard with 2 USB 3.0 ports and 2 SATA 6Gb/s connections added. All the usual USB 2.0 and SATA II 3Gb/s connectors are still on there but I thought it a good idea to get in there quick.

I am building myself a new system I hope that lasts for 5 years or more. USB 3.0 devices will become more abundant in 1-2 years and cheaper by the 3rd year. For anyone getting a new system it makes sense to include USB 3.0.
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



Discuss in the forums

More About...