Intel Core 2 Duo E8500, E8400 and E8200

April 7, 2008 | 07:28

Tags: #2 #45nm #6mb #cache #core #cpu #duo #e8200 #e8400 #e8500 #evaluation #overclocking #review #wolfdale

Companies: #intel #test

Memory Performance

Lavalys Everest Memory Performance

Website: Lavalys

Everest Memory Performance Test

Sorted by Descending Memory Read Results

  • AMD Athlon X2 6400+ (2x3.2GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • AMD Athlon X2 6000+ (2x3.0GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E8500 (2x3.16GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6850 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E8400 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E8200 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6550 (2x2.33GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.67GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • AMD Phenom 9600 (4x2.3GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo Q6600 (4x2.40GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • AMD Phenom 9500 (4x2.2GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E4500 (2x2.20GHz, 800MHz FSB)
    • 9371
    • 9211
    • 8968
    • 8772
    • 8626
    • 8455
    • 7379
    • 7065
    • 7163
    • 7361
    • 6080
    • 6712
    • 7327
    • 7091
    • 7151
    • 7293
    • 6076
    • 6718
    • 7240
    • 7088
    • 7174
    • 7157
    • 6066
    • 6742
    • 6930
    • 4862
    • 5529
    • 6809
    • 4535
    • 7331
    • 6784
    • 4873
    • 5536
    • 6726
    • 4509
    • 7197
    • 5845
    • 3635
    • 4206
0
2500
5000
7500
10000
MB/s
  • Read (MB/s)
  • Write (MB/s)
  • Copy (MB/s)

The Phenoms don't score so highly in Everest because only a single CPU is stressed and the northbridge frequency is far lower than that of the AMD Athlon X2s. While the read speeds of the Wolfdales remain consistent with the previous generation of Conroes, according to to Everest, the write and copy speeds have been largely improved.

Everest Memory Latency Test

  • AMD Athlon X2 6400+ (2x3.2GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • AMD Athlon X2 6000+ (2x3.0GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • AMD Phenom 9600 (4x2.3GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • AMD Phenom 9500 (4x2.2GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E6850 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E8500 (2x3.16GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E8400 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E8200 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6550 (2x2.33GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.67GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo Q6600 (4x2.40GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E4500 (2x2.20GHz, 800MHz FSB)
  • 44.1
  • 46.4
  • 64.8
  • 65.6
  • 67.7
  • 68.1
  • 68.3
  • 68.5
  • 69.4
  • 70.5
  • 70.6
  • 71.9
  • 77.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
nanoseconds (lower is better)

However, the Wolfdale latencies are also slightly higher too compared to equivalent clocked Conroes.

SiSoftware Sandra Lite XII.2008.SP1 (13.12)

Website: Sisoftware

Unbuffered Memory Performance

Sisoft Sandra Unbuffered Memory Test

  • AMD Phenom 9600 (4x2.3GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • AMD Phenom 9500 (4x2.2GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • AMD Athlon X2 6400+ (2x3.2GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • AMD Athlon X2 6000+ (2x3.0GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E8500 (2x3.16GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E8400 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E8200 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6850 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6550 (2x2.33GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.67GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo Q6600 (4x2.40GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E4500 (2x2.20GHz, 800MHz)
  • 8293.8
  • 8258.3
  • 7594.5
  • 7107.7
  • 6975.3
  • 6949.8
  • 6900.3
  • 6587.2
  • 6531.2
  • 6519.5
  • 5534.2
  • 5527.3
  • 4261.3
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
MB/s

The Wolfdales come out on top in all accounts, even the lowest clocked E8200 is ahead of the fastest Conroe in these synthetic bandwidth scores. In contrast, the latest Sisoft Sandra (1312) loads all the Phenom cores and rewards it with a much higher general performance, however the low 1,066MHz FSB of the Intel quad-cores makes them somewhat bandwidth starved.

Memory Latency

Sisoft Sandra Random Memory Latency Test

  • AMD Athlon X2 6400+ (2x3.2GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • AMD Athlon X2 6000+ (2x3.0GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E8500 (2x3.16GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E8400 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6850 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E8200 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.67GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6550 (2x2.33GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo Q6600 (4x2.40GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • AMD Phenom 9600 (4x2.3GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E4500 (2x2.20GHz, 800MHz FSB)
  • AMD Phenom 9500 (4x2.2GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • 64
  • 66
  • 80
  • 82
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 88
  • 88
  • 89
  • 96
  • 96
  • 98
0
25
50
75
100
nanoseconds (lower is better)

In contrast again, Sisoft Sandra reports the Wolfdales as sometimes having a lower latency than Everest reports. The E8200 is 1ns slower, whereas the E8400 is 2ns faster than the equivalent clocked Conroe.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04

TOP STORIES

SUGGESTED FOR YOU