Hyundai W241D 24" widescreen monitor

Nice review.

But why the hell are you measuring input lag using a Dell 30"? Use a CRT, which has NO lag FFS.

Having said that I can't stand using CRTs. Any chance of a Dell 2408WFP review soon? No-one has reviewed it yet as far as I know. :)

Ever taken a photo of a CRT? You've got about a 90% chance of getting it half way through refresh (which is just darn ugly!)

Should i know the difference between PVA and IPS? And if i should could some one linkies me to a place where i could learn.

Is the W241D any better than the cheaper W240D? Or are they *exactly* the same (apart from the usb hub) ?

Originally Posted by iwog
Should i know the difference between PVA and IPS? And if i should could some one linkies me to a place where i could learn.

Dude, have you heard of wikipedia?

Originally Posted by Pricester
Ever taken a photo of a CRT? You've got about a 90% chance of getting it half way through refresh (which is just darn ugly!)

Yes I have actually, and I know how it looks as the image scans down. However, once you try a couple of times you can get a picture with the bit of the screen that is needed.

If you're measuring lag, then in my opinion, you should measure it against a fast monitor, such as a small 17" or 19" with a TN panel, rather than the 30" beast which is sure to have plenty of lag due to the complexity of such a large panel. I think its great that lag was measured, but it feels a little bit pointless when compared to such a strange benchmark.

The 3007WFP is known to not suffer from input lag.

thats a real nice monitor by looks but ! i feel this is better for price and and beter specs bar view angles been wanting a review.. acer p243w bang for buck and new stock as well <

Someone ought to kill the designer who first thought it would be a good idea to use the gloss fingerprint-dust-collector-plastic on all products from then on. It's everywhere and I hate it. I don't like the looks or the feature of showing all the dirt. Is it just me or does someone else dislike it as well?

Originally Posted by Jipa
Someone ought to kill the designer who first thought it would be a good idea to use the gloss fingerprint-dust-collector-plastic on all products from then on. It's everywhere and I hate it. I don't like the looks or the feature of showing all the dirt. Is it just me or does someone else dislike it as well?

I dislike it as well. But there was thought put behind using glossy finishes. Having a glossy frame is suppose reduce eye strain by keeping your eyes from focusing completely on the screen for a long period of time. A glossy screen (which I hate more than a glossy frame) is supposed to make for a sharper picture than a matted finish by not diffusing the color. It has it's ups and downs.

i just bought the 240d which is the same but without the usb hub and im very pleased with it

Just added an update about the panel - we've now had confirmation that it uses the Samsung S-PVA panel.

Hyundai make quite good quality monitors. I have a L70S+ which I have had for many years without any problems.

Originally Posted by oasked
Nice review.

But why the hell are you measuring input lag using a Dell 30"? Use a CRT, which has NO lag FFS.

Having said that I can't stand using CRTs. Any chance of a Dell 2408WFP review soon? No-one has reviewed it yet as far as I know. :)

also there is still lag on a CRT.. what is a scan?

I like the gloss black plastic. But it is a fingerprint magnet (i own a nokia 6120 which looks horrible after some use).

BTW, the first lag test has the same 3 pictures. The second row is different.

Thanks for that - I don't know how I missed it

yeah i would also like a review on the 2408, as far as i know the only reviews have been forum member based ones, which are making it look nice but i personally prefer on from a place i can trust

We're trying to get the Dell, but Dell doesn't want to send it (to either bit-tech or TR)... read into that what you will. :)

I love how they incorporate the USB feature into the side monitor - very convenient.

i read somewhere that the light bleed mentioned improves when you get some mileage on this monitor, although mine looks fine

2heir flick:
2kenco_uk:
hyundai 240d is not the same, 240 uses TN panel..

Originally Posted by gigik
2heir flick:
2kenco_uk:
hyundai 240d is not the same, 240 uses TN panel..

I believe there are two versions of the 240D - one with TN (W240D-TN) and one with PVA (W240D-PVA). See here: http://www.overclockers.co.uk/productlist.php?groupid=703&catid=17&sortby=nameAsc&subid=&mfrid=128

that's true i have the 240d pva, in fact there are three versions all together

http://www.novatech.co.uk/novatech/products/a942x1y0z1p0s0n0m283

wow I see, In our country (czech republic in europe) you can get only TN 240D

but this review suck anyway, no measured parameters (real min/max brightness in cd, real contrast, real response time in different situations, if it has a HW or SW brightness regulation, colorimetric difference, and such things I look after when I buy lcd...)

Originally Posted by Jipa
Someone ought to kill the designer who first thought it would be a good idea to use the gloss fingerprint-dust-collector-plastic on all products from then on. It's everywhere and I hate it. I don't like the looks or the feature of showing all the dirt. Is it just me or does someone else dislike it as well?

I have a keyboard that is glossy black. THAT must be the most stupid thing ever. (Why the bloody **** did I buy it anyway? )