bit-tech.net

Intel Santa Rosa mobile platform

Comments 1 to 13 of 13

Reply
DarkLord7854 9th May 2007, 14:41 Quote
Sounds good to me :)
Wonder how well it could handle Ultimate though
Robotrix 9th May 2007, 14:53 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkLord7854
Sounds good to me :)
Wonder how well it could handle Ultimate though
There's no performance difference with running the Ultimate version of Vista compared to other versions... LOL.
1e8o 9th May 2007, 15:30 Quote
Interesting...looking for an new notebook...
Awoken 9th May 2007, 15:51 Quote
8600GT? I wonder how this stacks up against the current top of the mobile gfx leaderboard the 7950GTX.
DarkLord7854 9th May 2007, 15:52 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robotrix
There's no performance difference with running the Ultimate version of Vista compared to other versions... LOL.

It says it can run Premium, doesn't say anything about the others, so how can you be sure?
Highland3r 9th May 2007, 16:06 Quote
Might have to hold off a laptop upgrade for a little bit then! Do you have any rough figures for battery life at all? If possible comparaisons to similarly specced "old" merom systems
Ramble 9th May 2007, 17:07 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkLord7854
It says it can run Premium, doesn't say anything about the others, so how can you be sure?

Ultimate is only running slightly more services, Aero et al is exactly the same as it is on premium.
GamingHobo 9th May 2007, 17:34 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Highland3r
Might have to hold off a laptop upgrade for a little bit then! Do you have any rough figures for battery life at all? If possible comparaisons to similarly specced "old" merom systems

That's pretty difficult atm because by all accounts Vista does have some effect on battery performance, so any testing would have to be done on Vista and MobileMark - the benchmark for battery testing - doesn't currently work on Vista.
Highland3r 9th May 2007, 17:44 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by GamingHobo
That's pretty difficult atm because by all accounts Vista does have some effect on battery performance, so any testing would have to be done on Vista and MobileMark - the benchmark for battery testing - doesn't currently work on Vista.

Just after a rough flavour, doesnt have to be anything scientific. Just a "bit better/loads better/crap" would do fine :)
Tyinsar 9th May 2007, 21:55 Quote
Interesting stuff ;)

I'm just hoping they don't build Robson / Turbo Memory / ReadyBoost directly on to the main board. I'd be willing to accept a little bit bigger laptop if it means this is put on modules that can be removed, replaced, or upgraded - if it's soldered onto the board I'm not interested
DXR_13KE 9th May 2007, 23:32 Quote
i hope it is all modular. and i hope some of this technology comes to desktops :D.
Saivert 10th May 2007, 11:27 Quote
As for desktops you already got iRAM solution for very speedy harddrives, and you can put USB devices internally by doing some modding (e.g. hook a USB thumb drive directly to the pin headers on motherboard).

ExpressCard solution is also usable for ReadyBoost. And according to TrustedReviews you can look forward to 4GB, 8GB & 16GB ExpressCard SSDs From Lexar.
Tim S 10th May 2007, 12:07 Quote
Bearlake will come with Robson technology too, afaik.
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



Discuss in the forums