bit-tech.net

Vadim Cepheus Q80

Comments 51 to 54 of 54

Reply
Bindibadgi 14th February 2007, 09:18 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLoney
awesome review.
Any chance of more images (with unshrunk vers.) in future reviews. One of the things (IMO) that really sets Bit-Tech apart.


just wanted to say that tho' I would not pay that much, if I was going to the hot glue wwould really put me off..

I've still got loads of pics: what angle do you want? I'll get a large detailed one uploaded for you.
simosaurus 15th February 2007, 14:50 Quote
wtf @ slicon holding the grill onto the sides of the case. that was surely slapped on with a cock :|
Damouse 20th February 2007, 00:50 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fozzy
Damn that's like $10,000 in USD. For $10,000 I'd think someone would want something that nobody else could ever have without copying it. I think that's a good deal because it has the warranty. The watercooling is nice too. It's just alot of money to throw down on a pc. Plus watercooling isn't necessary on a pc of that calibre. Of course neither is quad-core or sli

Are you insane? you want to NOT water-cool an over clocked quadcore and the 2 8800's? Its gonna sound like a freakin jet plane landing in the backyard with a space shuttle strapped to the top if you can even possibly manage to find a fan cooler thatll keep the quad cold and stable. I dont think it would be safe for the enviroment if you didnt water cool that.
JaredC01 20th March 2007, 00:06 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damouse
Are you insane? you want to NOT water-cool an over clocked quadcore and the 2 8800's? Its gonna sound like a freakin jet plane landing in the backyard with a space shuttle strapped to the top if you can even possibly manage to find a fan cooler thatll keep the quad cold and stable. I dont think it would be safe for the enviroment if you didnt water cool that.
I suppose you haven't been keeping up with air-cooling technology... While it may be true that air-cooling will never reach water-cooling level, it's already close enough to get similar performance with similar sound levels as water-cooling. Enough so not to justify spending the extra money on the water-cooling system in most cases.

On that note, with the computer costing as much as it does, it would be silly not to add the water-cooling while you're at it...

Edit: Bumping an old thread F.T.L. :(
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



Discuss in the forums