bit-tech.net

Asus P5N32-E SLI Plus

Comments 1 to 25 of 43

Reply
DougEdey 6th February 2007, 15:06 Quote
Nice board. One thing though, with the memory benchmarks, the close grouping on the X axis makes the chart ugly.,
Mother-Goose 6th February 2007, 15:11 Quote
Good if you cant afford the striker but some of the features that are missing are a shame. That said, it is not an enthusiast's board. Nice review, good pics too :P
WhiskeyAlpha 6th February 2007, 15:20 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mother-Gooser
Good if you cant afford the striker but some of the features that are missing are a shame. That said, it is not an enthusiast's board. Nice review, good pics too :P

Really? Solid state capacitors, dual 16x PCI-E lanes, with an additional 8x PCI-E, and overclocking bordering on the Striker Extreme.

I think it'd be fairer to say it is a more affordable enthusiast's board.
Tim S 6th February 2007, 15:39 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by DougEdey
One thing though, with the memory benchmarks, the close grouping on the X axis makes the chart ugly.,
It's a bug with the current autographer we use... it's being fixed soon. ;)
Mankz 6th February 2007, 15:40 Quote
Nice review, and great photography as allways. :D

Anywho, will we be seeing a review of the Asus P5N-E (that 650i board that Highland3r has) soonish ?? Looks like it does all this board does for about half the price, and it has the added bonus of loosing those blasted heatpipes.
kenco_uk 6th February 2007, 15:55 Quote
My deity, it's tempting. Muuust resiiist. Why not have eight sata ports, though?

Btw, there's two spelling mistakes and a couple of grammatical errors :)
trig 6th February 2007, 16:22 Quote
im retarded, i know...but what are the main differences between 650 and 680? i get confused...
rupbert 6th February 2007, 16:23 Quote
I note the points missing from the Asus P5B Deluxe (Unlinked memory/CPU Bus), however it seems to have more useful features for less money (eSATA etc), and I would say a better board layout as well specifically the IDE connector...

So is there any real reason to go for this over the P5B Deluxe?
[USRF]Obiwan 6th February 2007, 16:42 Quote
I find the 150 dollar price difference for a few leds and a 1x16 lcd and some copper tubing disturbing...
Bindibadgi 6th February 2007, 17:24 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by rupbert
I note the points missing from the Asus P5B Deluxe (Unlinked memory/CPU Bus), however it seems to have more useful features for less money (eSATA etc), and I would say a better board layout as well specifically the IDE connector...

So is there any real reason to go for this over the P5B Deluxe?

proper SLI

Three x16 slots

All solid state caps

Unlinked memory, with more dividers.
Techno-Dann 6th February 2007, 17:40 Quote
Quote:
...paired with an AMD nForce 590 SLI MCP southbridge.

I wasn't aware that AMD made the nForce 590 SB... (And the same mistake is made on the front page blurb, too)
Tim S 6th February 2007, 17:55 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Techno-Dann
I wasn't aware that AMD made the nForce 590 SB... (And the same mistake is made on the front page blurb, too)
It's the AMD edition of the 590 SLI MCP
zr_ox 6th February 2007, 18:13 Quote
Nice review Tim, I have been hitting F5 button at work for the last 8 hours ;)

The board does seem to be very good value for money when compared to the Striker, although it just does not seem to be a thoroughbred. I was all set to go out and buy this today but now I'm not sure. The fact that it failed your stability tests so quickly gives me cause for concern. As does the fact that the heat coming from the northbridge is so substantial

What do you think about removing the heat pipes for the mosfets and northbridge, add some passive heat sinks to the mosfets whilst actively cooling the northbridge?

Given that you have a stable eVGA motherboard in the Alienware machine, and have tested the Striker given the price difference which would you buy?
rupbert 6th February 2007, 18:14 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bindibadgi
proper SLI

Three x16 slots

All solid state caps

Unlinked memory, with more dividers.

Fair enough. :)
pendragon 6th February 2007, 18:17 Quote
im a little surprised you rated the board as high as you did.. it sounds like from the crashing in Prime95 it might not be such a stable board :-/ ... I mean, its supposed to support Core2Quad right? ...and Quadcores are supposed to be awesome for multitasking,correct? ...so wouldnt a board that has trouble with multitasking not be a board that you would want to buy if you ever plan on upgrading to quadcore?
Tulatin 6th February 2007, 18:56 Quote
It'll stabilize over time - my P5B does the same thing.

The one issue that bugs me is that it REALLY wouldn't have been SO hard for ASUS to give us users another 2/4 USB ports on the back panel along with an E-Sata or 2. This is still a $300 board here, and it's off putting to get midrange packages with high end (but not extreme) prices.
Bindibadgi 6th February 2007, 19:27 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by pendragon
im a little surprised you rated the board as high as you did.. it sounds like from the crashing in Prime95 it might not be such a stable board :-/ ... I mean, its supposed to support Core2Quad right? ...and Quadcores are supposed to be awesome for multitasking,correct? ...so wouldnt a board that has trouble with multitasking not be a board that you would want to buy if you ever plan on upgrading to quadcore?

True, but it ran two lots of prime95 and I could do other things just fine. It's only when you try to run a game as well it decides to not like Prime and continue the game. We had no problem with multithreaded apps or video encoding which were very intensive. The level of multitasking is something people currently very rarely do. The stress test we perform is more than manufacturers tend to do themselves.

It's also still using the first revision BIOS, which is good considering first revisions of other boards we've seen.
airchie 6th February 2007, 19:47 Quote
After my main PC (in my sig) just started playing silly buggers for no reason, I suspect the mobo is b0rked.
So I was considering getting a 680i mobo to replace and hopefully return the aw9d-max.

What to get though?
This board? P5B-Dlx? abit IN9?

What I really want is good overclocking, 3 USB headers on the board and if poss, a northbridge I can remove and watercool instead of these bloody heatpipes that every 680i board seems to have.

Anything that fits the bill?

If not, what's the best 680i board to get (preferably not too expensive) and I'll just do some ducting from the rear case fan to the heatpipe'd heatsink. :)
zr_ox 6th February 2007, 20:02 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by airchie

What I really want is good overclocking, 3 USB headers on the board and if poss, a northbridge I can remove and watercool instead of these bloody heatpipes that every 680i board seems to have.

Anything that fits the bill?

I have been Googling since reading this review and it seems like the best option given features and value is the eVGA 680i. Given the amount of heat the Northbridges are giving off, especially when OCing you could slap the new DD 680i block on it. The Southbridge runs cool so a passive heatsink should suffice.
DXR_13KE 6th February 2007, 22:03 Quote
cheaper and very powerful :D
samkiller42 6th February 2007, 22:38 Quote
This looks like a very decent board, would Tim or Bindi recomend me replacing my EVGA board with this one?

SAm
Mother-Goose 6th February 2007, 22:55 Quote
I'm the kind of person who gets sucked in by leds, buttons and lcd's on the mobo so striker it is for me, i know there is not logical reason to but I can afford it so i might as well i guess.
airchie 6th February 2007, 23:36 Quote
Decided on the abit IN9.
Should go nicely with the two new raptor 150s I added to the order! :)
tuteja1986 7th February 2007, 07:28 Quote
I am waiting for Gigabyte 680i motherboard reviews before i buy build a new intel machine.
Mankz 7th February 2007, 08:22 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuteja1986
I am waiting for Gigabyte 680i motherboard reviews before i buy build a new intel machine.

Is that the board that has a heat-pipe going round under the board to cool the back of the CPU ???

Seems like a silly board to me.
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



Discuss in the forums