Published on 27th April 2006 by
Originally Posted by Adnuohttp://www.bit-tech.net/content_images/Zalman_Quiet_Trio/18.jpg
Someone want to inform me what the difference between "Noiseless" and "Silent" is? Their own little made-up graph even takes a huge hike between the two.
Originally Posted by AdnuoAlso, the fan on the XFX 6800GT is nowhere near silent, or even "pretty good".
Originally Posted by AdnuoAlso, it would have been nice to have the actual stats of the PSU, other than "this many watts lol torque". Things like the individual amperage on each line, etc. etc.
Originally Posted by AdnuoAnd a deeper dive into the difference between the lower and higher models, other than "one is for SLi and one isn't". Is that because the lower end has less power on the 12V lines? Or the higher one has dual 12V rails to keep the graphics cards on a seperate, steady line?
Originally Posted by AdnuoLast niggle -- Zalman have fitted non-standard molex on their power supplies, which work extremely well and make removing them from tight sockets very nice, but if you're working in tight quarters, these can sometimes get in the way. Another thing that could be important to mention.
Originally Posted by dire_wolfI assume that noisless means that the fan will be switched off altogether, and silent is slow RPM.
At £70 inc vat, which appears to have been recently cut from £80, the ZM460-APS is far from cheap, its silence is in fact golden in more ways than one. The Globalwin Super Silent 450W, Akasa Ultra Quiet 460W and Tagan 420W Whisper Quiet PSU all come in at nearly £20 cheaper than the ZM460-APS and claim to be silent or thereabouts.
Originally Posted by Rich_13the 7900's do run a fair bit hotter from what i hear, would be great with a follow up.
Originally Posted by yahooadam
Some actualy testing (Watt wise and such) of the PSU would have been nice, but i dont know if bit tech have the equipment to do it
Originally Posted by yahooadam
The important things seem to be, real load, power usage, operating tempreatures
also measuring with motherboard moniters is not good testing ...
Originally Posted by FlyActually I used a handheld K-Type Thermometer for temperatures, my ears for sound levels and a multimeter for voltages.
Originally Posted by yahooadamwell you would have to take a measure of your surroundings and then what its like running
Originally Posted by FlySurroundings?
That's as vague as it gets. Distance? Directions of sensor? Is the wall absorbing or reflecting? Review sites have to recreate the testing environment exactly as it was for every review, and it is impossible to do so unless you have a chamber to do the testing in. This is why a subjective report on sound levels is more useful in this case.
Originally Posted by Adnuo
Also, it would have been nice to have the actual stats of the PSU, other than "this many watts lol torque". Things like the individual amperage on each line, etc. etc.
Originally Posted by FlyIt's there if you look.
Another non-visible difference is the inclusion of a 92mm PWM fan for the CNPS9500-AT, allowing the motherboard to control the speed of the fan according to the temperature of the CPU, which is essential to keep noise at a minimum during low processor usage.
You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.
16th April 2015
15th April 2015
14th April 2015
© Copyright bit-tech