Published on 20th September 2013 by
Originally Posted by sotu1
I think the issue is that GTA (to the best of my knowledge) has never had a great female character that stands out, apart from generic prostitute/pornstar/slut girlfriends....
Originally Posted by alf-Catalina from GTA3 was a standout female character for me, she wasn't a stereotypical depiction of a female character by any means.
Originally Posted by tonyd223wonder what the piracy rate is on PC for a game like this?
Originally Posted by KrikkitQuote:Originally Posted by alf-Catalina from GTA3 was a standout female character for me, she wasn't a stereotypical depiction of a female character by any means.
That's true! She was a seriously bad-ass character. As was that Japanese dominatrix, Asuka.
Originally Posted by HustlerQuote:The vehicles have been tuned so they no longer handle like a block of lard on a bed of marbles
..if that's the case then one of the obstacles to me ever purchasing another GTA title has been removed.
Playing through GTA IV became too much of a battle against appalling controls and vehicle handling, causing me to repeatedly fail missions, in the end I just didn't have the time or patience to try and master it, so gave up.
The vehicles have been tuned so they no longer handle like a block of lard on a bed of marbles
Originally Posted by ResCyn Can women not be ****ed up, psychotic arseholes too?
Originally Posted by CthippoThey could use my ex for the character design :p
Originally Posted by PargeOh, I thought I was on BT rather than RPS. I don't know/haven't heard of a single girl that will be playing this, so I don’t know how denying 51% of the population a female character to play with is an issue. More like 1% of the playerbase - and nothing in the entire history of the world can cater to 100% of the population.
Its an 18, so anyone playing it should have a reasonably developed sense of right and wrong, and equal societal rights for both genders, and if they haven’t then I doubt one game is going to change their opinion in either direction. If kiddies are playing it, well, then its really up to the parents to police that, and bring them up as decent, balanced people, able to make a informed opinion on these types of issues.
Originally Posted by RoskokenAye man, plus little things like if you buy your ammo en-mass from a particular seller there shares perform better.
Originally Posted by ShirtyIt's an opinion piece - nobody is obliged to agree with it!
Read lots of opinions and formulate your own opinions.
Originally Posted by alf-Odd review, almost felt like you went out of your way to dislike aspects of the game.
"Meanwhile, the non-mission stuff still doesn't feel like it matters all that much. Sure, you can play tennis, or go hunting, or get drunk and play in traffic, and the mechanics, animations, and environments for doing all those things in are amazing, but none of it has any sense of meaningfulness"
SRSLY meaningfulness? you're looking for meaningfulness when you're dicking around in GTA?
Originally Posted by guvnarPC version please, Rockstar!
Now... if it's not too much trouble!
But when the writing descends to characters calling each other (and I quote) a "f***ing f***", well, that speaks for itself.
Originally Posted by lirathealQuote:Originally Posted by RoskokenLike when you destroy a rival corporations infrastructure so the shares tank and you can make a killing from the stock market?
Wait wait wait.
Can you actually do that of your own volition, or is it a scripted event side quest affair?
Originally Posted by RoskokenLike when you destroy a rival corporations infrastructure so the shares tank and you can make a killing from the stock market?
You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.
26th September 2014
24th September 2014
22nd September 2014
© Copyright bit-tech