Comments 26 to 32 of 32

Quote Redbeaver 26th November 2008, 21:32
u guys need to post some Maggie Q pictures................
Quote naokaji 27th November 2008, 02:42
On what system where you guys reviewing it? xbox360 or ps3?

Because from IGN's review it runs like crap on the ps3, form my experience it runs like crap on the pc.... however ign did say it runs somewhat ok on the 360, so if you reviewed it on the 360, everyone who plays it on a non 360 has to deduct 2 from your score.

Tier 2 cars regularly win against tier 1 cars, the environment looks bland, boring and allways the same, physics? damage model? never heard of and driving is so easy I would call it nfs train simulator as the cars drive like on rails and no matter how bad you drive you never loose control over it. Also while the cars dont look bad, they could also look better, just have a look at GT5 Prologue to see what I mean.

Also during races you get solid walls to the left and right of the course, so there is zero choice where to drive apart from a smallish number of predefined "shortcuts". On top of all that, the career is very short, you'll be through with it in no time.
Quote Tulatin 27th November 2008, 03:45
This game is so simple to give a two word review to. It's ****.
Quote Bauul 27th November 2008, 16:30
Quote:
Originally Posted by crash32953295@msn.
Thanks CardJoe for the explanation, I can see where you guys come from and I cant argue with the logic of your system but I still feel with so many high quality games out now there needs to be more that seperates them I dont beleive ive ever seen a game hit below a 5 on this in the last year. Obviously I could be wrong and someone might prove this, I just think having a score rating where no games even hit below 5 in the last year means that we need to raise our standards and what we expect. even if the 10 is then unacheivable it gives the industry something to work for.

But you have explained how and why you do it, so I will leave it at that. :)

Stalker Clear Sky got 3! And before anyone kicks off, it was for good reasons (broken product).

Personally I think BT are pretty good with their scores, they very rarely heap huge amounts of praise on a game when it isn't needed. Look at something like GTA4, where everyone was giving it 100/100 Best Game Ever uber scores, BT settled for a far more realistic mid 9/10. They're far more happy to dish out the 6s and 7s than many online publications are.
Quote ashchap 27th November 2008, 23:23
Quote:
the game gives you the option to buy parts or tuning packages with real money if you’re lacking in in-game cash.

What?! are you serious? I can kind of see why people would buy stuff in online games for real money, but in a single player game? I don't get it
Quote naokaji 28th November 2008, 07:23
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashchap
What?! are you serious? I can kind of see why people would buy stuff in online games for real money, but in a single player game? I don't get it

And one that is easy as it gets to start with:D
Quote gilesy 29th April 2009, 13:42
this game was very poor ,underground and underground2 where very good then they went all stupid and look at what happens your left with something that runs like all f**k all imo ,if nfs shift turn out like this its the last nfs i will buy ever
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.





Dragonage