50 Cent: Blood on the Sand

I love Joe's attempt at rapper street lingo.

Jesus.... Moth********g... Christ. Amazing.

That is just a f***tastic game... really...

I'm amazed that Joe managed to write this whole review without a single "bust a cap in yo ass" joke. :)

Story-wise, it’s a shame because it feels like there was a missed chance here to make a franchise game that was a bit more self-aware; something that could make fun of itself

But that wouldn't work because 50 Cent (and all other rappers of his ilk) genuinely believe that they are "da s**t yo"

If I'm honest from that review I'd acctually want to play that game, for nothing else other than a laugh. But I suppose it depends on how you take the violence and swearing and how serious it tries to take itself because tbh that sounds funny to me.

If i ever played the game, i would definately all the time see how many times i could get 50 killed.

What i want to know is, how did anyone even start designing the game based around Mr small change. Either there hoping there are enough morons out there to buy it, or they just got alot of money to waste.


Hangs head in shame that this even exists.

tbh having read this review i might buy the game if a slice of the proceeds weren't going to that slack jawed, sted pumped retard

Can't be much better than the cack he records!

Originally Posted by Mankz
I love Joe's attempt at rapper street lingo.

Feel it, bro.

I should think the arms dealer packs the RPGs in bubble wrap envelopes before faxing them, so people don't get suspicious.

Originally Posted by Hiren
I'm amazed that Joe managed to write this whole review without a single "bust a cap in yo ass" joke. :)

Quiet fool, he's polishin' his nine ya'll.

How about you character assassinate every game character that represents something you don't like in real life or how about you don't, lets just review the game - i doubt its hard . . . . .

there is no need to change what bit-tech is here for, i bet fiddy has a lot more critics Joe don't add yourself to them

This is genius, it's almost as bad as the first game..

Unfortunately, The lowest common denominator will always be a factor.

Originally Posted by Burnout21
If i ever played the game, i would definately all the time see how many times i could get 50 killed.

What i want to know is, how did anyone even start designing the game based around Mr small change. Either there hoping there are enough morons out there to buy it, or they just got alot of money to waste.


Hangs head in shame that this even exists.

I was thinking I would prefer to be the evil Eye-rack-ees with AKs trying to take pot shots at them. Now that would be a good game. You start off in some little farming village or something with a goat, and then some American gangstas run over your goat and drive off, laughing and listening to loud, obtuse music. You start the game in like a mini tutorial, as you walk around your village and talk to the rest of your community about what happened, you get that emotional connection to friends who are ill but have no money for medicine, you basically are the most deprived people there.

You encounter a policeman and tell him your plight, but he responds with the usual authoritan thuggishness that, whilst somewhat cliched, is relevant to all players really in the current climate. The government doesn't care about your little village, and the police do little more than take bribes and smoke drugs. So you go to your tribal leader, and off starts a campaign somewhat akin to FarCry2, except rather than being abstract random missions where your own people shoot at you because you're on a secret mission, it's a well played out narrative where you meet people from the 'resistance' who may have lost their families, you hear TV reports of how the western media reports recent skirmishes - and how their perspective is that you are part of a terrorist cell or whatever.

The finale could wrap up with all hell kicking off, you leading a coup against what you perceive to be a corrupt puppet government put in place by the Americans, with the final scene being something like that out of CoD5: WaW where the Russian lifts the flag over the Reichstag, you celebrate with your comrades and AKs on top of a palace or whatever (this obviously in some middleeastern city) when all of a sudden you are blinded by white light and silence, then the sonic boom catches up with you and the whole world around you is ripped asunder from a nuke.

Quite a dramatic and evocative way to end a game :D. Yea that would be interesting, although can you imagine the bible belt in America? Lol.

Originally Posted by MBR
How about you character assassinate every game character that represents something you don't like in real life or how about you don't, lets just review the game - i doubt its hard . . . . .

there is no need to change what bit-tech is here for, i bet fiddy has a lot more critics Joe don't add yourself to them

Editorial freedom, man ;)

why are you people even reviewing this trash? It doesn't even worth the space in front page of bit-tech. *sigh* ...

hint: killzone2 is out

Man...how does this guy keep getting his crap produced? Isn't this his third game already?

Its kinda sad I guess. If there weren't idiots to buy games like these, they wouldn't be made....

50 Cent in real life:

http://stupidcelebrities.net/wp-content/50cent2.jpg

50 Cent in game:

http://images.bit-tech.net/content_images/2009/03/50-cent-blood-on-the-sand-review/b00.jpg

Lol.

snoop dogg game imo

Originally Posted by wafflesomd
50 Cent in real life:

http://stupidcelebrities.net/wp-content/50cent2.jpg

50 Cent in game:

http://images.bit-tech.net/content_images/2009/03/50-cent-blood-on-the-sand-review/b00.jpg

Lol.

It's close, one just looks more blocky and foolish..can you spot it?

This **** again?

I'd rather waste my time in WOW or Spore than play this.
Sorry to all the people that worked so hard on making a game, having 50 cent in it, puts me off of it.

Originally Posted by Dreaming

Quote:

Originally Posted by MBR
How about you character assassinate every game character that represents something you don't like in real life or how about you don't, lets just review the game - i doubt its hard . . . . .

there is no need to change what bit-tech is here for, i bet fiddy has a lot more critics Joe don't add yourself to them

Editorial freedom, man ;)

Yeah - but we trust Bit-tech to give us a non-personal (to high a degree as possible) and Professional review of all things they review. Yeah personal feelings may be contained in the review - but tone them down, or don't let them Rule the review

Please, someone - anyone, justify the existence of this game to me. You've got thirty seconds...

*tic toc tic toc tic toc...*