Published on 8th April 2013 by
Originally Posted by Pieface40%?
Bit-Tech trying to jump on the bandwagon or something? Or trying to be cool and be anti-EA?
Originally Posted by Roskoken40% is still too high for this piece of ****.
Few new maps, lack of kill cam, but still gets 99%? Seems a bit high given the lac k of new maps especially is a fairly large omission. What is better to regenerate a series after all than brand spanking new maps that new players be on level playing field with the older player?.
Originally Posted by BogomipI guess what im saying is how do you even decide upon these scores? :S
Originally Posted by GeorgeStormWhilst this review doesn't make me want to play it, watching people actually play it (both IRL and on youtube) really does.
You can see the bugs etc and it's still a fun game, with a lot of potential, the worst part for me is the possibility they'll be a million DLCs making the game cost even more than it already does...
Originally Posted by fdbh96Hopefully they'll do a bf3 type premium thing so you can pay for it up front.
Small maps, yes some feel small, especially the ones where half map is hill. But that can be improved.
You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.
11th February 2016
10th February 2016
9th February 2016
© Copyright bit-tech