Published on 9th March 2012 by
Originally Posted by greypilgersIdon't understand ...
Originally Posted by greypilgersIdon't understand how much of the review seems to suggest it's an 'almost', or a 'not quite as good', or has other good but not great comments, and then suddenly whacks on a 90% score and a top grade award??? It reads like a significant portion of the review was just edited out - can we have the whole review, please, so we can put this all in to context?
Originally Posted by overlordukI hope the boring, unimaginative corridore and crates level design has improved. And I hope the world feels more alive instead of the same few characters standing in the same place everytime you visit somewhere like the Citadel for example.
Originally Posted by wafflesomd7/10 before the ending. 0/10 after the ending.
Originally Posted by cjmUKSounds like it's a game to get in the sales frankly.
Originally Posted by ArticleIf you've come this far, it's a sin not to go further.
Originally Posted by kingredI completed the game.
So many glaring plot holes, awkward cover system which gets in the way in later on, incredibly bad animation and porting to the pc.
Remind me of how this is 90% again?
Originally Posted by HovisWhole trilogy, end to end, about a hundred hours, probably one of the greatest artistic endeavour of this century. And that probably sounds like hyperbole but, in fairness, it's not been a great century so far.
You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.
5th December 2016
1st December 2016
30th November 2016
© Copyright bit-tech