bit-gamer.net

Lula 3D Retrospective

Comments 1 to 17 of 17

Reply
docodine 18th January 2011, 08:38 Quote
This is clearly a plug, how much are the people cdv paying you guys?
Niftyrat 18th January 2011, 09:21 Quote
The question on my mind is how the reviewer knows what an otter being put in a shredder actually sounds like one thinks the RSPCA might not like that!

Game sounds dreadful and even farming simulator would be better
pistol_pete 18th January 2011, 09:55 Quote
Can this be included in your list of games for graphics card benchmarking please?
Snips 18th January 2011, 10:17 Quote
"It's a hint of crudery for people who never flicked through the mythical adult mag in the bushes at their local park"

How did you know? I thought I kept so quiet.
katmandude 18th January 2011, 11:06 Quote
tried to get some info directly from cdv. not much info, no trailers ( wonder why lol) , scren shots don't work ( wonder why :p ). Finally got some intel off youtube, game video quality was rubbish, more akin to what was happening 10 years ago. There was clearly some nudity, even spotted some full on nudity in the bar/pole dancing sceen!!! GOD this game looks crappy, body mechanics look all wrong, the video of lula on the phone was one endless repeat of the same frames! the guys in this game all look like sleazy sex driven slobs high on controled substance with an IQ of a dead hamster. what in gods name possessed you to make a article of this? what was the point? even looking at windows 95 boot was more exciting than this game...
alpaca 18th January 2011, 11:21 Quote
he was caught playing this game, 'catching some boobs' when his editor came up behind him, asking him what he was doing... 'euhm euhm reviewing a euh... game' he managed to get past his troath. With an evil grin on his face, the editor said 'i will be expecting it... have a nice day'

and so here it is...
Bauul 18th January 2011, 13:33 Quote
Motion capture boobies?

Can you imagine the newspaper ad for that?

"Wanted. Women for motion capture. Must have: boobs - huge. Self-respect - tiny. Must be willing to stand on the spot and jiggle for five days."
Snips 18th January 2011, 13:49 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bauul
Motion capture boobies?

Can you imagine the newspaper ad for that?

"Wanted. Women for motion capture. Must have: boobs - huge. Self-respect - tiny. Must be willing to stand on the spot and jiggle for five days."

Can I judge? Hubba! Hubba!
paisa666 18th January 2011, 16:09 Quote
man I though bit-tech was taking some political path to express its views and opinions... then I started reading the actual article and my day its again quiet and calm
law99 18th January 2011, 17:12 Quote
Did anyone in the whole of the universe see merit to buy this though? Surely it's only worth, like you say, for burning.
mute1 19th January 2011, 01:53 Quote
I don't know what I find more incredible: that you did a retrospective on this 'game'; that the retrospective ran to two pages; or that you played or even bought this in the first place.
Plus, I thought Joe was the perv. ;)
Cupboard 19th January 2011, 02:18 Quote
OK, ignoring the fact the review is ridiculous..

it is great! That is one of the funniest reviews I've read in ages, thank you!
CardJoe 19th January 2011, 04:24 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by mute1

Plus, I thought Joe was the perv. ;)

Wha?!
SMIFFYDUDE 19th January 2011, 11:56 Quote
Lula 3D is a truly awful game. Play Frontal Assault if you really want boobs in a game.

http://fa.xmunkki.org/
mute1 20th January 2011, 00:14 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by CardJoe
Wha?!

E.g. http://www.bit-tech.net/blog/gaming/2009/06/29/games-i-own-sin-and-sin-episodes/
http://www.bit-tech.net/blog/gaming/2009/09/26/games-i-own-dungeon-keeper-theme-park-th/

You know it's true. ;)
Time for you to graduate to bishoujo... [shudders]
Da_Rude_Baboon 20th January 2011, 11:04 Quote
Why?

Why do a retrospective on a game which most people will have never heard of to tell us its awful and we should avoid it? Your Blur retrospective has a point; it was a good game by an established developer that went unnoticed due to poor advertising and its launch time. Doing retrospectives on classics to see how they have aged and what their legacy has been is interesting.

To be blunt some of the articles and opinion pieces that have appeared under the 'bit-gamer' banner have been the worst on the site.
paisa666 20th January 2011, 17:55 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Rude_Baboon
Why?

Why do a retrospective on a game which most people will have never heard of to tell us its awful and we should avoid it? Your Blur retrospective has a point; it was a good game by an established developer that went unnoticed due to poor advertising and its launch time. Doing retrospectives on classics to see how they have aged and what their legacy has been is interesting.

To be blunt some of the articles and opinion pieces that have appeared under the 'bit-gamer' banner have been the worst on the site.

TO laught a litle bit? they offer some nice comedy momments!!
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



Discuss in the forums