Published on 9th March 2010 by
Originally Posted by JezcentralI must be one of the few people who want the game to continue the story. We want to find out what happens next!
I don't care about the multi-player, I want to see how Jim Raynor saves the galaxy.
Originally Posted by vanuit seems so unappropriate for someone who hasn't played SC to make a comparison between the two games. You say there is nothing new. Why would you change a formula that has worked for more than 10 years? The SC community expected exactly this, some eye candy, new units, great balance. Not to mention the story behind the game, one of the best stories ever (you are somehow free of accusations on this point since it's only a multiplayer beta).
To sum it up - you're obviously not a RTS player therefore this article has no value whatsoever.
Originally Posted by tad2008I didn't play SC1 either and yet from these first impressions all I can see is yet another cloned variation of Command & Conquer and Blizzard's own World of Warcraft series set in a different environment. Both allowed you to build attacking units quickly and go and attack your opponents early on in the game and C&C was notorious for having a build system that once understood allowed you to work up to Nuke your opponent in a very short space of time.
To wait 10 years for a sequel is just plain dumb, for Blizzard to wait 10 years to come back to an old game and give it the no. 2 moniker only says to me that they must be out of any really original ideas.
Originally Posted by GFCBest rts game ever. All there is to it.
Originally Posted by JamieHaving played this beta it was exactly what I expected. Identical to Warcraft 3 in pretty much every way but based in the Scarcraft universe. It is yet another RTS that is won or lost by build order and uber micro.
Originally Posted by CardJoeYou've obviously not really read the article, since that's something I talk specifically about - the fact that it wasn't broke and didn't need fixing.
And playing the first game doesn't suddenly qualify or validate someone's opinion. You might not have played all the Hitman games, for example, but I'd still give consideration to your point of view if you said that Hitman: Contracts was rubbish.
You're obviously a hardcore SC fan and I'm obviously not - but that doesn't mean my opinion is wholly and objectively meritless. That's just moronic.
Originally Posted by D-Cyph3rQuote:Originally Posted by GFCBest rts game ever. All there is to it.
Incorrect. SupCom shows this up as the ancient rehash it is.
It's not even finished or out yet....
Originally Posted by idontwannaknowrant
Originally Posted by StewbJust a point. You can rotate the camera, insert and delete rotate it through about 30 degrees each way. Not proper I know, but you can do it slightly.
Originally Posted by smc8788Wow, the level of SC snobbery in this thread is epic.
You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.
22nd March 2017
21st March 2017
20th March 2017
© Copyright bit-tech