Originally Posted by Gunsmith sounds like a console buisness plan to me
The game wasn't released on consoles :|
In any case, I don't know of any console game with a subscription model, it just sounds like they're trying to get their hands on some of that WoW cash to me.
Originally Posted by Gunsmith sounds like a console buisness plan to me
The game wasn't released on consoles :|
In any case, I don't know of any console game with a subscription model, it just sounds like they're trying to get their hands on some of that WoW cash to me.
my bad, should have made myself clearer, was reffering to the initial release and then the constant chargable DLC making it a "complete experiance"
I have pre-ordered the game (on steam) and have been playing since the day it was released. Eventually I got bored and unintalled the game. I am a big fan of this kind of games and still play sim city 4 but that is the big problem with this game. It is not that better than sim city 4 at all. Actually, it is really similar in so many levels. You get sc4, remove the pipes, remove the public transportation, put a chat were people are constantly calling each other "noobs" or writing "I can't find my city" and you have Cities XL.
I am not paying for the online part of it and I don't care if the graphic is better than sc4, off course it is.
I was going to get this game despite the high price until I just read this review. If it wasn't for its exploitive nature making everything exclusive to the monthly fee package and extra DLC then it would be a great replacement for Sim City 4. Guess I'll have to skip out on this one then.
I also enjoyed the water pipe and electricity line part of SC4 and wish that Monte Cristo could have at least put the mass transport feature into the single player.
Well I got it and paid for the PlanetMode, it's not too bad, though it does leave you feeling a bit shafted.. they definitely could have made more of an effort on the game.
I was a beta tester for the C:XL and I was kind of impressed at how everything was done but then with time i slowly grew back to SC4. Really could use an SC5 by MAXIS and not EA
When I started reading this review it looked fantastic and I was fully expecting to drop and order for it... definitely not though based on this review and considering the business model that the developer is clearly aiming for.
It's bad enough having a monthly subscription for the extra content - I'd have ignored that in any case as I don't do subscription based gaming - but having that AND in-game advertising is not something I'll be paying for.
What concerns me most is how the in-game advertising is operated - I take it that the game will use an Internet connection to grab ads, which raises so many privacy concerns that unless it's removed I won't be considering this game.
. If Cities XL were a real place, it’d be Milton Keynes - built with good intentions, but the end result isn't somewhere you'd want to visit for too long.
Game agreed to refund me after buying this game as the packaging is clearly miss-leading, you can not really play this game in single player. They argued a little but I told them I felt I had been miss-sold the product and the manager agreed to refund.
Comments 1 to 22 of 22
ReplyTime for Sim City 5, methinks!
Personally i'd prefer EA to stay well away from the Sim City franchise. I mean, just take a look at SC Societies.
Sticking with Sim City 4 then.
"£6.95 monthly subscription"
Then I :(
Would like to see bit-tech review it
The game wasn't released on consoles :|
In any case, I don't know of any console game with a subscription model, it just sounds like they're trying to get their hands on some of that WoW cash to me.
my bad, should have made myself clearer, was reffering to the initial release and then the constant chargable DLC making it a "complete experiance"
I am not paying for the online part of it and I don't care if the graphic is better than sc4, off course it is.
I also enjoyed the water pipe and electricity line part of SC4 and wish that Monte Cristo could have at least put the mass transport feature into the single player.
Good review though.
Oh, and this game isn't all that and a bag of chips.
It's bad enough having a monthly subscription for the extra content - I'd have ignored that in any case as I don't do subscription based gaming - but having that AND in-game advertising is not something I'll be paying for.
What concerns me most is how the in-game advertising is operated - I take it that the game will use an Internet connection to grab ads, which raises so many privacy concerns that unless it's removed I won't be considering this game.
Heh
someone should send this over to the developer. . . .
-
« Previous
-
1
-
Next »
Discuss in the forums