bit-gamer.net

Cities XL Review

Comments 1 to 22 of 22

Reply
kenco_uk 29th October 2009, 09:14 Quote
That's a bit disappointing. It's definitely a looker, that's for sure.

Time for Sim City 5, methinks!
DragunovHUN 29th October 2009, 10:00 Quote
I knew the MMO feature was going to cripple the singleplayer game. Ah well i'm sticking with SC4 then.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenco_uk

Time for Sim City 5, methinks!


Personally i'd prefer EA to stay well away from the Sim City franchise. I mean, just take a look at SC Societies.
500mph 29th October 2009, 10:02 Quote
Nice to see some new features, but too bad you have to pay for them.
Sticking with Sim City 4 then.
steleet 29th October 2009, 10:31 Quote
At first I was like :D

"£6.95 monthly subscription"

Then I :(
Gunsmith 29th October 2009, 11:04 Quote
sounds like a console buisness plan to me
Hg 29th October 2009, 11:21 Quote
tbh Tropico 3 is the game you should get forget this one, its far much more fun to play.
Would like to see bit-tech review it
smc8788 29th October 2009, 11:27 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunsmith
sounds like a console buisness plan to me

The game wasn't released on consoles :|

In any case, I don't know of any console game with a subscription model, it just sounds like they're trying to get their hands on some of that WoW cash to me.
Baz 29th October 2009, 11:34 Quote
Internet Money
Gunsmith 29th October 2009, 12:25 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by smc8788
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunsmith
sounds like a console buisness plan to me

The game wasn't released on consoles :|

In any case, I don't know of any console game with a subscription model, it just sounds like they're trying to get their hands on some of that WoW cash to me.

my bad, should have made myself clearer, was reffering to the initial release and then the constant chargable DLC making it a "complete experiance"
LeMaltor 29th October 2009, 13:10 Quote
Was a bit sus when I dled the demo, installed, then was told the demo period had ended....eerrrrr
plagio 29th October 2009, 13:12 Quote
I have pre-ordered the game (on steam) and have been playing since the day it was released. Eventually I got bored and unintalled the game. I am a big fan of this kind of games and still play sim city 4 but that is the big problem with this game. It is not that better than sim city 4 at all. Actually, it is really similar in so many levels. You get sc4, remove the pipes, remove the public transportation, put a chat were people are constantly calling each other "noobs" or writing "I can't find my city" and you have Cities XL.

I am not paying for the online part of it and I don't care if the graphic is better than sc4, off course it is.
Er-El 29th October 2009, 14:02 Quote
I was going to get this game despite the high price until I just read this review. If it wasn't for its exploitive nature making everything exclusive to the monthly fee package and extra DLC then it would be a great replacement for Sim City 4. Guess I'll have to skip out on this one then.
I also enjoyed the water pipe and electricity line part of SC4 and wish that Monte Cristo could have at least put the mass transport feature into the single player.
micha80 29th October 2009, 15:08 Quote
It's really hard to make a good city builder. I am currently playing Tropico 3 and it really is all I need.
DarkLord7854 29th October 2009, 16:04 Quote
Well I got it and paid for the PlanetMode, it's not too bad, though it does leave you feeling a bit shafted.. they definitely could have made more of an effort on the game.

Good review though.
C-Sniper 29th October 2009, 16:41 Quote
I was a beta tester for the C:XL and I was kind of impressed at how everything was done but then with time i slowly grew back to SC4. Really could use an SC5 by MAXIS and not EA
Star*Dagger 29th October 2009, 17:42 Quote
Fail
Rkiver 29th October 2009, 17:54 Quote
So the moral of this story is, avoid Milton Keynes then.
Oh, and this game isn't all that and a bag of chips.
Kiytan 29th October 2009, 22:03 Quote
how disapointing. I also throw in another vote for tropico 3, it's an excellent game (any chance we could get a review though?)
thewelshbrummie 29th October 2009, 23:19 Quote
When I started reading this review it looked fantastic and I was fully expecting to drop and order for it... definitely not though based on this review and considering the business model that the developer is clearly aiming for.

It's bad enough having a monthly subscription for the extra content - I'd have ignored that in any case as I don't do subscription based gaming - but having that AND in-game advertising is not something I'll be paying for.

What concerns me most is how the in-game advertising is operated - I take it that the game will use an Internet connection to grab ads, which raises so many privacy concerns that unless it's removed I won't be considering this game.
Digibull 30th October 2009, 00:04 Quote
Quote:
. If Cities XL were a real place, it’d be Milton Keynes - built with good intentions, but the end result isn't somewhere you'd want to visit for too long.

Heh
LucusLoC 30th October 2009, 23:45 Quote
thanks for the review, i will not be getting this game.

someone should send this over to the developer. . . .
spt 7th November 2009, 15:11 Quote
Game agreed to refund me after buying this game as the packaging is clearly miss-leading, you can not really play this game in single player. They argued a little but I told them I felt I had been miss-sold the product and the manager agreed to refund.
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



Discuss in the forums

More About...