So, I built my new gaming machine last night
Posted on 2nd Feb 2009 at 12:55 by Tim Smalley with 33 comments
I've been wanting to build my new PC for some time now because I've been having my fair share of issues over the past few months, but it's not as new as many of you would expect. I've been running a quad-core processor since 2006 and I haven't felt the need to upgrade it yet, even though Intel has now released its true successor, Core i7.
I'm still running a QX6700 and this is the third system upgrade the same processor has gone through. I guess it's a testament for how forward looking Intel's quad-core processors were - performance enhancements came with the 45nm Penryn core and then there's even more performance available with a Core i7, but I'm more than happy with how much performance there is on tap with my QX6700.

I've merely upgraded some parts of my system that were either on their last legs or just getting a bit long in the tooth.
My old P5B Deluxe motherboard has been in and out of my system twice now - it was my board of choice when I first upgraded to the QX6700 and I'd upgraded to a P35 motherboard a year later. However, I didn't get on with that particular board, so I went back to my 965P-based stablemate. But it's been on its last legs for a while, and it was the most important thing for me to change.
I believe it is what has been giving me the most headaches over the past few months because, although I'd got 4GB of memory installed, every monitoring tool I've tried said only 3GB of it was working. I'd tried moving the memory around to no avail - each time it said there was just 3GB of the 4GB working. It had to be a dead memory slot.
Understandably, this was causing my whole system to slow down and often grind to a halt so it had to be fixed. I talked with Rich at great length about what motherboard I should upgrade to, and in the end we decided that the Asus Maximus II Formula would fit the bill for my needs and, touch wood, that has worked out incredibly well so far. What's more, it was our motherboard of the year last year and one of an elite group of boards to be given a 10/10 overall score, so it'd be a bit strange if one of us didn't put our money where our mouths are.
With my 4GB of RAM now working fine, there was no need to upgrade my memory - I'm still running 4x1GB OCZ PC2-6400 C4 modules at pretty lax timings. The reason I've done that this time around though is so that I can increase the memory bus with some overclocking. Although I said my CPU has more than enough power, I've decided that a bit of overclocking can't hurt - my main reason for not overclocking in the past was the power consumption, but because the Maximus II Formula allows Intel SpeedStep technology to continue working when using the CPU Step Up auto overclocking function, I'm no longer going to be needlessly consuming power that I'm not using. I used the 'crazy' setting and that pumped my CPU up to 3.51GHz (351x10) - that should be more than enough to keep me going for a while.
I've also upgraded both my graphics and power supply as well - I've gone with BFG Tech on both fronts because I've had good experiences with the company as a customer in the past. The graphics card I opted for was a BFG Tech GeForce GTX 280 OC, which I've got running at its stock speeds as it should be plenty to power my current 1,680 x 1,050 monitor with lots of anti-aliasing turned on for good measure. Previous to this card, I had a Radeon HD 4870 512MB in my system - a great card, but there are a couple of downsides. First, the amount of anti-aliasing I was trying to play games with was proving a little too much for the card's 512MB frame buffer and second, its idle power consumption isn't that great. The GeForce GTX 280 doesn't have either of these problems and it is actually a pretty power efficient card with all things considered. There's also support for PhysX as well, and I've been wanting to play Mirror's Edge ever since I first saw the console version. Of course, Mirror's Edge is one of the first games to implement PhysX and so I want to play the game with all of that turned on... even if it is only eye candy.
The power supply I've opted for is BFG's 800W ES Series unit - it combines high power efficiency afforded by the innovative design with pretty solid rails. It's also an exceptionally quiet unit when running at the kind of load levels I'll be using it at.
The only other hardware upgrade I've done was to my storage array - I'd been collecting hard drives more readily than stamps, it would seem. I had five different drives in my system before I upgraded - two 500GB Western Digital Caviar Blacks, a Maxtor MaxLine III 300GB, a 120GB Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 and a 160GB Western Digital Caviar. I've replaced the three smaller drives with a single 1TB Samsung SpinPoint F1 and that's now my boot drive while the two 500GB drives are for games, music, video and photos. My Steam folder is almost 200GB on its own, so one of those drives is reserved solely for my collection of games.
Probably my most interesting upgrade though was to the operating system. I've been testing the Windows 7 beta on my notebook ever since I got back from CES and I've so far been thoroughly impressed. So much so that I didn't want to go 'back' to Vista when it came to building this machine - it's not that I don't like Windows Vista, I just believe Windows 7 is a much better OS. Even in its beta state.
I'm keen to find out how stable Windows 7 is as a gaming platform at this point in time because Windows Vista drivers appear to work just fine. Of course, they're not based on the newer WDDM 1.1 specification yet, so I won't see any advantages from what the new spec brings, but that's not a major concern at the moment. I've currently got the 181.22 WHQL drivers installed and so far so good - I'll keep you updated on my progress with the OS, but I see no reason to go back to Vista for the time being.
I'm still running a QX6700 and this is the third system upgrade the same processor has gone through. I guess it's a testament for how forward looking Intel's quad-core processors were - performance enhancements came with the 45nm Penryn core and then there's even more performance available with a Core i7, but I'm more than happy with how much performance there is on tap with my QX6700.

I've merely upgraded some parts of my system that were either on their last legs or just getting a bit long in the tooth.
My old P5B Deluxe motherboard has been in and out of my system twice now - it was my board of choice when I first upgraded to the QX6700 and I'd upgraded to a P35 motherboard a year later. However, I didn't get on with that particular board, so I went back to my 965P-based stablemate. But it's been on its last legs for a while, and it was the most important thing for me to change.
I believe it is what has been giving me the most headaches over the past few months because, although I'd got 4GB of memory installed, every monitoring tool I've tried said only 3GB of it was working. I'd tried moving the memory around to no avail - each time it said there was just 3GB of the 4GB working. It had to be a dead memory slot.
Understandably, this was causing my whole system to slow down and often grind to a halt so it had to be fixed. I talked with Rich at great length about what motherboard I should upgrade to, and in the end we decided that the Asus Maximus II Formula would fit the bill for my needs and, touch wood, that has worked out incredibly well so far. What's more, it was our motherboard of the year last year and one of an elite group of boards to be given a 10/10 overall score, so it'd be a bit strange if one of us didn't put our money where our mouths are.
With my 4GB of RAM now working fine, there was no need to upgrade my memory - I'm still running 4x1GB OCZ PC2-6400 C4 modules at pretty lax timings. The reason I've done that this time around though is so that I can increase the memory bus with some overclocking. Although I said my CPU has more than enough power, I've decided that a bit of overclocking can't hurt - my main reason for not overclocking in the past was the power consumption, but because the Maximus II Formula allows Intel SpeedStep technology to continue working when using the CPU Step Up auto overclocking function, I'm no longer going to be needlessly consuming power that I'm not using. I used the 'crazy' setting and that pumped my CPU up to 3.51GHz (351x10) - that should be more than enough to keep me going for a while.
I've also upgraded both my graphics and power supply as well - I've gone with BFG Tech on both fronts because I've had good experiences with the company as a customer in the past. The graphics card I opted for was a BFG Tech GeForce GTX 280 OC, which I've got running at its stock speeds as it should be plenty to power my current 1,680 x 1,050 monitor with lots of anti-aliasing turned on for good measure. Previous to this card, I had a Radeon HD 4870 512MB in my system - a great card, but there are a couple of downsides. First, the amount of anti-aliasing I was trying to play games with was proving a little too much for the card's 512MB frame buffer and second, its idle power consumption isn't that great. The GeForce GTX 280 doesn't have either of these problems and it is actually a pretty power efficient card with all things considered. There's also support for PhysX as well, and I've been wanting to play Mirror's Edge ever since I first saw the console version. Of course, Mirror's Edge is one of the first games to implement PhysX and so I want to play the game with all of that turned on... even if it is only eye candy.
The power supply I've opted for is BFG's 800W ES Series unit - it combines high power efficiency afforded by the innovative design with pretty solid rails. It's also an exceptionally quiet unit when running at the kind of load levels I'll be using it at.
The only other hardware upgrade I've done was to my storage array - I'd been collecting hard drives more readily than stamps, it would seem. I had five different drives in my system before I upgraded - two 500GB Western Digital Caviar Blacks, a Maxtor MaxLine III 300GB, a 120GB Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 and a 160GB Western Digital Caviar. I've replaced the three smaller drives with a single 1TB Samsung SpinPoint F1 and that's now my boot drive while the two 500GB drives are for games, music, video and photos. My Steam folder is almost 200GB on its own, so one of those drives is reserved solely for my collection of games.
Probably my most interesting upgrade though was to the operating system. I've been testing the Windows 7 beta on my notebook ever since I got back from CES and I've so far been thoroughly impressed. So much so that I didn't want to go 'back' to Vista when it came to building this machine - it's not that I don't like Windows Vista, I just believe Windows 7 is a much better OS. Even in its beta state.
I'm keen to find out how stable Windows 7 is as a gaming platform at this point in time because Windows Vista drivers appear to work just fine. Of course, they're not based on the newer WDDM 1.1 specification yet, so I won't see any advantages from what the new spec brings, but that's not a major concern at the moment. I've currently got the 181.22 WHQL drivers installed and so far so good - I'll keep you updated on my progress with the OS, but I see no reason to go back to Vista for the time being.







33 Comments
Discuss in the forums ReplyThe last month i've added some stuff to my PC, but it seems my budget is slightly lower. My endresult is very similar though:
2TB harddisks, W7, 1GB GPU an overclocked quadcore ;)
So far, i've had two issues with W7:
1) installing the OS, it was unable to create a system partition. It was the first time i ever used a RAID array, so i thought that i had a driverproblem, but it turned out you need to install W7 on the volume that's listed first in BIOS. For some reason, my 1GB pendrive (used for RAID drivers) was occupying that spot
2) unable to install certain programs, such as skype and daemon tools.
I'm also very impressed with it though.
Great build Tim, and fun to read what kind of setup you are running. I'm glad it's not an i7 965/24GB RAM/2x GTX295/1600W/12TB RAID5/Watercooled/uberuber-rig :p
Have fun with it!
PS: shame on you for not overclocking a QX!
I had a quick game of HL2DM at lunch time today and it seems good so far. I'm not expecting it to be faster on my own machine - what are you running out of interest?
I'm also currently using Win 7 (X64 naturally ;)) as my main OS even though im tri booting Vista & XP and i find that my games are running much smoother compared to Vista (even with it heavily tweaked)
A GTX280 should be able to handle 2560x1600, shouldn't it? I think the horsepower race has given us some rediculously overpowered cards lately, even at that resolution. I mean, do you need 16xAF + 32xFSAA + 8 instances of Folding@Home in the background? :p
HUH?
so your system is now: q6700 at 3.5Ghz, 4GB RAM, gtx280 BFG OC1 and 2TB of storage?
my system is surprising similar :P q6600 at 3.4Ghz, 8GB RAM, gtx260+ OC2 and 1.07GB of storage.
are game reviews going to be using that system? it's a very rounded system and a very good representation of current mainstream.
When you actually game probably, macboi
I also have P182 as a server, the shiny special edition B)
It's the fastest of the drives I've got in my system now and most of my storage is on the two 500GBs at the moment. I'll probably get all of my photos and such copied onto the 1TB, but aside from programmes, that's about it.
What weather gadget is that by the way?
Sorry for the hijack but Xtra: You can get the Skype 4 Beta. Runs perfectly fine on both my computers. :)
The weather gadget is just the enlarged version of the standard Win7 weather gadget.
Yep, Win7 is great... tonight I'll be playing Mirror's Edge til either I drop or the system does! :D
Yeah, Win7 is a polished version of Vista in many respects... but I think it's much more than that. Most of the design choices were right this time, whereas a lot of Vista's weren't. Moving back to something lightweight when it needs to be is refreshing to say the least.
I see you had the same issue I had with the gtx 280 and the P182's upper drive cage ;)
It was time for my yearly XP re-install last week, and I decided to give Win7 Beta (x64) a go. I had decided to give Vista a miss, but I was curious and thought I could just install XP if I didn't like it.
So far my experience has been positive. I haven't used Vista so I have no basis for that comparison, but I agree with what you and others have said about Win7. Gaming has been smooth, I haven't noticed lower frame rates compared to XP, but I've only been playing DX9 games for the past week.
The only issue I've had is with my AVG anti-virus. Every time I boot I get an Action Centre warning to turn AVG on, I do this, but AVG never turns on. I can live with this for a while until I have time to research a fix.
MAJOR GRIPE ALERT! What the hell has happened to the UP tree button in folders?? I never knew how much I used it until it was gone! Alt-Up is just no substitute for a handy button in the save-file dialogue box.
i do miss the UP button, but the folder names are good enough once you get used to it.
You can do both of these if you are browsing folders, but it is missing from the save/load-file dialogue box, where I use it most.
If you need to access a folder OTHER than the one you just saved to/loaded from, you have to either use Alt-Up or take the long path from the drive root (in my case, my storage D:).
I can't seem to find any options regarding this, and from looking around other's comments this seems a "feature" new to Vista. As I've never used Vista this was an unpleasant surprise.
Click on the > right before the current directory to see a listing above or click on Local Disk (C:) for example to go there.. it took some time to adjust for me too when I switched from xp
Quick question: the GTX 260 is a pretty slick card and cheaper then the GTX 280 but performs similarly. Why'd you chose the 280 over the 260?
There were a few deals going around on the 280s and I snapped one up when I could - we mentioned the good deals in our January buyer's guide. :)
I am considering giving this a try now as i will probably buy a upgrade anyway.
PS - CS4 works perfectly fine
Don't know about Premiere or Maya but Sony Acid 6, Vegas 8 run without any problems although 7 said during the Acid install that the MS SQL Server Desktop Engine is known to have issues with this OS.
thanks!
I've got Photoshop and Premiere Elements running on my Win7 machine and they work fine. :)