Originally Posted by zulu9812 What constitutes "Design"?
That depends on what is being reviewed. For a CPU cooler for instance it could cover things such as how easy it is to fit, the size, the noise, does it have a fan controller. Whereas for a headset it would cover things such as comfort and tone controls.
Yeah....I thought that too. It sounds like some bull**** marketing hyperbole that manufacturers would rather put on their boxes than the current 'Recommended' award TBH.
I don't think "Extreme Ultra" is quite silly enough. The next time I read a review of something like the EVGA SR-2 or GTX 590, I want to see an "It's over 9000!!!!" award. :D
Generally approve of all of this...I think it's about time we changed the review system! And happy for this to go inline with CPC.
But really, EXTREME ULTRA!1!!ONEONE!lolgasm!! for a game isn't neccessary at all...In fact I've never heard anyone refer to a game as extreme ultra....come to think of it, i've not heard that for a PC component either...
Scrap the ultra, please! It's borderline childish!
Originally Posted by Bad_cancer Urm, I don't usually comment on this kind of thing, but here goes:
I love the new scoring system. Its precise and simple to understand and I like the new badges....
BUT
Extreme ultra?....wouldn't Extreme suffice?
Extreme Ultra is a bit of an office in-joke - and something we felt was suitably hyperbolic to express the semi-seriousness of that award. It's essentially the same as Crazy but Cool, yes.
just a little design comment. in the breakdow, do you really need to put the "%" symbol? do you really think people wouldn't understand if it lacks that? besides, it would be much more cleaner if it isn't there.
oh, and the "Extreme Ultra" could be renamed to "Chuck Norris Approved" or just "Chuck Norris". lol
Comments 1 to 25 of 92
ReplyBut I 100% agree on the grading system, never understood why other people don't use a percentage rather than 10/10 or 5/5 etc.
That depends on what is being reviewed. For a CPU cooler for instance it could cover things such as how easy it is to fit, the size, the noise, does it have a fan controller. Whereas for a headset it would cover things such as comfort and tone controls.
Yeah....I thought that too. It sounds like some bull**** marketing hyperbole that manufacturers would rather put on their boxes than the current 'Recommended' award TBH.
/takes off cynical hat
Why not call it Enthusiast(s Choice) or some such.
Implementation : 90/100
Value : 100/100
Overall : 80/100
Ljs Approved : Super- Mega-Epic Award.
I love the new scoring system. Its precise and simple to understand and I like the new badges....
BUT
Extreme ultra?....wouldn't Extreme suffice?
Edit: If you are going the silly route, I put forward a motion to rename "Extreme Ultra" the "Over 9000" award as stated by r3loaded.
But really, EXTREME ULTRA!1!!ONEONE!lolgasm!! for a game isn't neccessary at all...In fact I've never heard anyone refer to a game as extreme ultra....come to think of it, i've not heard that for a PC component either...
Scrap the ultra, please! It's borderline childish!
Extreme Ultra is a bit of an office in-joke - and something we felt was suitably hyperbolic to express the semi-seriousness of that award. It's essentially the same as Crazy but Cool, yes.
If it helps differentiate the products you review better, that is a good thing.
oh, and the "Extreme Ultra" could be renamed to "Chuck Norris Approved" or just "Chuck Norris". lol
That would be amusing. Unfortunately we'd have to pay Chuck Norris a shed load of royalties for using his name to endorse a product :(
-
« Previous
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
Next »
Discuss in the forums